Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13040975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Attention to Sustainability and SDGs: Meta-Analysis of Academic Papers

Abstract: Scientific research plays an important role in the achievement of a sustainable society. However, grasping the trends in sustainability research is difficult because studies are not devised and conducted in a top-down manner with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To understand the bottom-up research activities, we analyzed over 300,000 publications concerned with sustainability by using citation network analysis and natural language processing. The results suggest that sustainability science’s diverse and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, the development of a new sustainable energy paradigm is mainly based on the new developments performed by scientific research. To understand the bottom-up research activities, Asatani et al [153] developed a citation network analysis and natural language processing methodology. More than 300,000 publications related to sustainability were involved.…”
Section: Energy Policy For Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the development of a new sustainable energy paradigm is mainly based on the new developments performed by scientific research. To understand the bottom-up research activities, Asatani et al [153] developed a citation network analysis and natural language processing methodology. More than 300,000 publications related to sustainability were involved.…”
Section: Energy Policy For Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some do not work with indexes or intermediate indicators because they use only primary and aggregate data to compose the final index, while others use all the steps of the information pyramid because they need a large amount of primary data to obtain the indicators, which are subsequently aggregated to obtain the final index [89]. The measurability of the sustainability is the key to implementing sustainable development [92].…”
Section: Data Indicators and Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy sustainability indicators capture the complexity of energy systems and offer new insights about what can be communicated to the general public [96][97][98][99][100]. The measurability of the sustainability is the key to implementing sustainable development [92]. Indicators and indices gain great importance and recognition as tools to formulate public policies and provide information of performance in areas such as economy, environment, society, and technology [93].…”
Section: Data Indicators and Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more robust and re ned clustering approach can assist the dissemination of scienti c ndings. Additionally, NLP methods can be applied to examine correspondence between research literature and societal goals, 13 implications of particular research terms, 16 along with a host of other issues bearing signi cance in our communities. [33][34] Limitations Similar to systematic and scoping reviews, the study sample is subjected to publication bias (which is especially true for a high-quality journal like Implementation Science).…”
Section: Implications For Synthesis and Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,12 They can inform the breadth of impact of a search tool (e.g., Web of Science 7 ), or shed light on trends within a speci c research eld. [12][13] NLP has been used across a variety of disciplines and consumer applications to understand scholarly publication trends, [13][14][15][16] but has not yet ltered into the methodological mainstream in the social services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%