2007
DOI: 10.1080/10509580701297950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Analogy and Literary Taxonomy in Darwin'sLoves of the Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one might today assume that the religious commitments of early eighteenth‐century poets and theologians would put them odds with the new scientific worldview, the reality, as Clark Lawlor notes, was that science, religion, and poetry were typically collaborators rather than competitors in this period. James Thomson's The Seasons (1728–44), for example, is, among other things, a work of physico‐theology that depicts nature as God's book while also imagining a cosmos that is best described using scientific language. Of course, it was not always easy to reconcile the metaphysical implications of Newtonian physico‐theology with traditional Christian doctrine.…”
Section: Poetry and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one might today assume that the religious commitments of early eighteenth‐century poets and theologians would put them odds with the new scientific worldview, the reality, as Clark Lawlor notes, was that science, religion, and poetry were typically collaborators rather than competitors in this period. James Thomson's The Seasons (1728–44), for example, is, among other things, a work of physico‐theology that depicts nature as God's book while also imagining a cosmos that is best described using scientific language. Of course, it was not always easy to reconcile the metaphysical implications of Newtonian physico‐theology with traditional Christian doctrine.…”
Section: Poetry and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing plant and animal behavior using scientifi c analogies (see Genter (1982) for background on scientifi c analogies vs. metaphors), Darwin was alluding to the materialistic basis of human behavior ( Beer, 1983 ), a tactic earlier used by Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709Mettrie ( -1751 ( La Mettrie, 1994 ) and Darwin ' s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802 ( Browne, 1989 ;Porter, 2007 ). Recently, several others have explored Charles Darwin ' s work on plant movement from historical ( Browne, 2002 ;Ayres, 2008 ;Kutschera and Briggs, 2009 ) or scientifi c ( Balu š ka and Mancuso, 2009 ;Ellison and Gotelli, 2009 ;Holland et al, 2009 ;Isnard and Silk, 2009 ;Moulia and Fournier, 2009 ) standpoints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731Darwin ( -1802 personifi ed plant reproduction in complex multilayered analogies to discuss human sexual behavior, plant physiology, and the unity of life ( Browne, 1989 ) in ways that prevented scientifi c analogy from slipping into literary metaphors ( Porter, 2007 ). Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731Darwin ( -1802 personifi ed plant reproduction in complex multilayered analogies to discuss human sexual behavior, plant physiology, and the unity of life ( Browne, 1989 ) in ways that prevented scientifi c analogy from slipping into literary metaphors ( Porter, 2007 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According as it did with the materialist theory of simple percepts, which combine by laws of association into more and more complex ideas, it likewise skirted the philosophical worry about analogy that increasingly haunted the age. As Wasserman (1953) and others (e.g., most recently, and both on Erasmus Darwin's complex and conflicted theory and use of analogy, Packham 2004 andPorter 2007) have argued, analogy was a common philosophical stopgap for the moral and theological unmooring that empirical metaphysics, and especially the doctrine of associationism, threatened to occasion. Coleridge Coleridge (1958Coleridge ( [1817, 1:83) characterized associations as "blind" and "habitual," but they are minimally constructive and purposive in that they seek similitude or, in Hartley's (1971Hartley's ( [1749, 1:293) definition of analogy, the "Resemblance, and in some Cases Sameness, of the Parts, Properties, Functions, Uses, &c. any or all, of A to B."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%