“…According as it did with the materialist theory of simple percepts, which combine by laws of association into more and more complex ideas, it likewise skirted the philosophical worry about analogy that increasingly haunted the age. As Wasserman (1953) and others (e.g., most recently, and both on Erasmus Darwin's complex and conflicted theory and use of analogy, Packham 2004 andPorter 2007) have argued, analogy was a common philosophical stopgap for the moral and theological unmooring that empirical metaphysics, and especially the doctrine of associationism, threatened to occasion. Coleridge Coleridge (1958Coleridge ( [1817, 1:83) characterized associations as "blind" and "habitual," but they are minimally constructive and purposive in that they seek similitude or, in Hartley's (1971Hartley's ( [1749, 1:293) definition of analogy, the "Resemblance, and in some Cases Sameness, of the Parts, Properties, Functions, Uses, &c. any or all, of A to B."…”