2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstper.2.020103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific abilities and their assessment

Abstract: The paper introduces a set of formative assessment tasks and rubrics that were developed for use in an introductory physics instruction to help students acquire and self-assess various scientific process abilities. We will describe the rubrics, tasks, and the student outcomes in courses where the tasks and rubrics were used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
153
0
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
153
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the application and the manipulating of equations do not guarantee an understanding of the underlying physics concepts. It has also been argued that students' ability and familiarity to handle different kinds of representations and translate information among different representational modes are scientific skills which need to be developed [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the application and the manipulating of equations do not guarantee an understanding of the underlying physics concepts. It has also been argued that students' ability and familiarity to handle different kinds of representations and translate information among different representational modes are scientific skills which need to be developed [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Self-diagnosis tasks'' are formative assessment tasks [1] that aim at fostering student learning in an examination context by requiring students to present their own diagnosis (in which they identify where they went wrong and explain the nature of the mistakes) as part of the activity of reviewing their quiz solutions [2][3][4]. These tasks are intended to induce students to generate self-explanations involving self-repair [5], meaning that in reflecting on their solution to a problem when they self-diagnose it, students will recognize and resolve conflicts between their possibly flawed mental model and the scientifically acceptable model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta clasificación se realiza en base a los criterios resumidos en los siguientes puntos: i) existe la propuesta de una pregunta investigable; ii) se realiza un diseño experimental, identificando las variables y las medidas que se deben realizar para recoger un conjunto de datos que ayuden a dar respuesta a la pregunta planteada; iii) se presenta una interpretación de los datos recogidos. Consideramos que cumpliendo estos tres puntos, tales presentaciones se consideran indagadoras ya que satisfacen los aspectos principales y más generales que una investigación científica debería presentar según diferentes descripciones del modelo indagador publicadas en la bibliografía (Biggers 2017;Etkina et al 2006;Forbes, Biggers y Zangori 2013). Cabe mencionar que la "comunicación", un aspecto fundamental del proceso indagador, no ha sido considerada para la selección puesto que es un punto común en todas las presentaciones exhibidas.…”
Section: Métodounclassified