2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-009-9160-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Teacher Learning of MBL-Supported Student-Centered Science Education in the Context of Secondary Education in Tanzania

Abstract: Science teachers from secondary schools in Tanzania were offered an in-service arrangement to prepare them for the integration of technology in a studentcentered approach to science teaching. The in-service arrangement consisted of workshops in which educative curriculum materials were used to prepare teachers for student-centered education and for the use and application of Microcomputer Based Laboratories (MBL)-a specific technology application for facilitating experiments in science education. Quantitative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the second category consists of teachers who believe that technology blurs the learning focus of students and thus inadvertently interferes with learning (Lavie, 2005). Despite most teachers recognizing the benefits of technology integration in the classroom (Voogt, Tilya, & Akker, 2009), a lack of successful experiences may influence their motivations to apply technology in teaching (Slaouti & Barton, 2007;Balanskat, Blamire, & Kefala, 2006). Thus, creating successful experiences of technology integration might entice teachers to apply technology in the classroom.…”
Section: Ability Of Senior Teachers To Integrate Technology Into Instmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the second category consists of teachers who believe that technology blurs the learning focus of students and thus inadvertently interferes with learning (Lavie, 2005). Despite most teachers recognizing the benefits of technology integration in the classroom (Voogt, Tilya, & Akker, 2009), a lack of successful experiences may influence their motivations to apply technology in teaching (Slaouti & Barton, 2007;Balanskat, Blamire, & Kefala, 2006). Thus, creating successful experiences of technology integration might entice teachers to apply technology in the classroom.…”
Section: Ability Of Senior Teachers To Integrate Technology Into Instmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies show that the integration of technology in educational practice is a complex innovation for teachers (e.g., Mumtaz, 2000;Webb & Cox, 2004;Voogt, Tilya, & van den Akker, 2009). Teachers have difficulty in integrating technology in their instructional processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCrory (2008) addressed four elements of TPACK in science education: a) knowledge of science; b) knowledge of students' perceptions; c) knowledge of science-specific pedagogy; and d) knowledge of ICT. This requires teachers to know which part of the science curriculum is difficult for students, how ICT can be used to resolve these difficulties, and for which science topic ICT is considered essential (Voogt, Tilya, & Akker 2009). …”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%