“…Several PSTs stated that they had drawn a macroscopic picture of what they had seen. This finding is in line with multiple studies showing that PSTs hold naïve and simplistic views of models as replicas or copies of a real system prior to model-or modelling-based interventions (Danusso et al, 2010;Soulios & Psillos, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). All science teachers should understand the meaning of a model beyond it merely being a copy or replica (Oh & Oh, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The PSTs who were interviewed emphasised how motivating it was to have the opportunity to model a phenomenon they observed themselves and to get to make several iterations of it. They claimed, in line with previous studies (Aktan, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016), that the use of models in school would make science more exciting and enjoyable and would involve pupils directly in the teaching and increase their urge to further explore. This experience supports Oh and Oh's (2011) suggestions that cyclic modelling can improve teaching practices and that modelling-based scaffolding frameworks can enhance engagement in scientific practice (Chiu & Lin, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Studies have shown that teachers describe models as artefacts for recalling and remembering content knowledge and as tools for simplifying, generalising and highlighting content (Aktan, 2016;Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). A desire to promote content knowledge from the curriculum rather than meta-knowledge about models can cause teachers to be more productoriented rather than process-oriented (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019).…”
Section: (2) 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-service teachers note that models can be used to assess pupils' content knowledge but that the assessment of modelling work can be challenging (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019). However, several studies show that PSTs believe models and modelling can prompt interest and creativity among pupils and can make the teaching more diverse, accessible and concrete (Aktan, 2016;Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). Additionally, models can provide a concrete reference point for the subject under study (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019) and can improve pupils' reasoning and arguing skills (Ryu et al, 2018;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017).…”
Section: (2) 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSTs have been found to hold naïve and simplistic views of models as only copies or replicas (Danusso et al, 2010;Soulios & Psillos, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). This naïve understanding is even evident for PSTs holding degrees in physics, engineering and mathematics (Danusso et al, 2010).…”
This study analyses pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs’) experiences of working with models and modelling and their ideas about their usefulness in science education. Although several studies have investigated pre- and in-service teachers’ views on models and modelling, research is lacking in the Norwegian context. This study addresses this gap by exposing PSTs to a one-day course on modelling in chemistry and exploring their ideas through focus-group interviews. We found that teaching using modelling-related activities promoted PSTs’ understanding of models and modelling, especially relating to the scope and limitations of models. Additionally, the PSTs increased their understanding of why such learning activitiesare important and how to incorporate them while teaching science. Norwegian PSTs responded positively to modelling-based teaching, which seemed to promote metacognition and critical thinking. Therefore, modelling-based teaching could be an effective tool for educating science teachers in how to promote such skills in their classrooms.
“…Several PSTs stated that they had drawn a macroscopic picture of what they had seen. This finding is in line with multiple studies showing that PSTs hold naïve and simplistic views of models as replicas or copies of a real system prior to model-or modelling-based interventions (Danusso et al, 2010;Soulios & Psillos, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). All science teachers should understand the meaning of a model beyond it merely being a copy or replica (Oh & Oh, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The PSTs who were interviewed emphasised how motivating it was to have the opportunity to model a phenomenon they observed themselves and to get to make several iterations of it. They claimed, in line with previous studies (Aktan, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016), that the use of models in school would make science more exciting and enjoyable and would involve pupils directly in the teaching and increase their urge to further explore. This experience supports Oh and Oh's (2011) suggestions that cyclic modelling can improve teaching practices and that modelling-based scaffolding frameworks can enhance engagement in scientific practice (Chiu & Lin, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Studies have shown that teachers describe models as artefacts for recalling and remembering content knowledge and as tools for simplifying, generalising and highlighting content (Aktan, 2016;Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). A desire to promote content knowledge from the curriculum rather than meta-knowledge about models can cause teachers to be more productoriented rather than process-oriented (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019).…”
Section: (2) 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-service teachers note that models can be used to assess pupils' content knowledge but that the assessment of modelling work can be challenging (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019). However, several studies show that PSTs believe models and modelling can prompt interest and creativity among pupils and can make the teaching more diverse, accessible and concrete (Aktan, 2016;Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). Additionally, models can provide a concrete reference point for the subject under study (Nielsen & Nielsen, 2019) and can improve pupils' reasoning and arguing skills (Ryu et al, 2018;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017).…”
Section: (2) 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSTs have been found to hold naïve and simplistic views of models as only copies or replicas (Danusso et al, 2010;Soulios & Psillos, 2016;Torres & Vasconcelos, 2017;Yenilmez Turkoglu & Oztekin, 2016). This naïve understanding is even evident for PSTs holding degrees in physics, engineering and mathematics (Danusso et al, 2010).…”
This study analyses pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs’) experiences of working with models and modelling and their ideas about their usefulness in science education. Although several studies have investigated pre- and in-service teachers’ views on models and modelling, research is lacking in the Norwegian context. This study addresses this gap by exposing PSTs to a one-day course on modelling in chemistry and exploring their ideas through focus-group interviews. We found that teaching using modelling-related activities promoted PSTs’ understanding of models and modelling, especially relating to the scope and limitations of models. Additionally, the PSTs increased their understanding of why such learning activitiesare important and how to incorporate them while teaching science. Norwegian PSTs responded positively to modelling-based teaching, which seemed to promote metacognition and critical thinking. Therefore, modelling-based teaching could be an effective tool for educating science teachers in how to promote such skills in their classrooms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.