Science Mandates Precision: A Plea for Accuracy in Reporting

Owyong, Michael; Landman, Jaime; Clayman, Ralph V.

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.028

Journal of Urology

2018

DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.028

|View full text |Cite

Science Mandates Precision: A Plea for Accuracy in Reporting

Michael Owyong

Jaime Landman

Ralph V. Clayman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 All told, this Level 1a study now clearly re-emphasizes what Dr. Ralph Clayman has been saying all along: let's stop the use of "clinically insignificant residual fragment" and reserve the term "stone-free" for no residual fragments on postoperative computerized tomography. 2,3 Roger L. Sur…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reply by Authors

Brain¹,

Geraghty

Lovegrove

et al. 2021

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

repeat interventions, particularly considering we do not fully understand the impact of repeat interventions on patients' quality of life. There is a wide range of stone-free rates quoted in the literature for stone removal procedures. The imaging modality and timing of re-imaging are important determinants of stone-free status, with studies showing that computerized tomography is more sensitive for residual stone fragments than other modalities, thus resulting in lower stone-free rates. 1 Re-imaging following stone removal procedures is important to identify patients with residual stone fragments who may be at risk for disease progression or re-intervention. Despite the high prevalence of kidney stones, there is very limited literature on the natural history of residual fragments with a near absence of prospective trials, emphasizing the need for further investigation. Future studies to understand the impact of repeat interventions on patient quality of life would also be of benefit.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reply by Authors

Brain¹,

Geraghty

Lovegrove

et al. 2021

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial Comment

Sur

2021

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

In Vitro Evaluation of Stone Fragment Evacuation by Suction

Schneider

Abedi

Larson

et al. 2021

Journal of Endourology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Science Mandates Precision: A Plea for Accuracy in Reporting

Cited by 5 publications

References 7 publications

Reply by Authors

Reply by Authors

Editorial Comment

In Vitro Evaluation of Stone Fragment Evacuation by Suction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About