Science interrupted

Parma, Valentina; Arceneaux, Kevin

doi:10.1017/pls.2022.1

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While these studies provide some evidence for the exclusionary role of COVID‐19, there is only little evidence that confirms the links between disgust sensitivity and prejudice towards outgroups among children (e.g. Parma & Arceneaux, 2022). Moreover, while threat seems to be a strong predictor of prejudicial attitudes among children too (Nesdale et al, 2005), children may be less likely to project COVID‐19 related frustration onto refugees and engage in scapegoating behaviours (Nesdale, 2007), as they may resort to strategic considerations on outgroup exclusion less than adults, therefore, suggesting only partial evidence for the exclusionary intergroup behaviours after the breakout among children (see Vezzali et al, 2015, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Looking for your cross‐group friends after the breakout? Children's intergroup contact behaviours before and after the onset of COVID‐19

Bağcı

Yalcin

Türnüklü

et al. 2022

British J Social Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While COVID‐19 implications for prejudice have been investigated among adults in previous research, children's intergroup reactions to the pandemic and specifically how native children's contact behaviours with refugees might have changed after the pandemic has not been examined yet. Drawing on a unique longitudinal school dataset ( N = 861, 5th graders, M age reported at T1 = 10.38, SD = 0.68) collected before the onset of the pandemic (T1, pre‐lockdown), after the onset of the pandemic (T2, post‐lockdown), and 6 months after the post‐lockdown (T3, follow‐up) in Turkey, we examined how children's contact behaviour (positive and negative contact), contact motivation (self‐efficacy and volition), as well as behavioural tendencies (approach and avoidance) have shifted during this period (2.5 years). We observed a consistent pattern of improvement in contact behaviours demonstrated by increases in positive contact variables and decreases in negative contact variables particularly from T1 to T2. The change in some positive contact variables was stable for 6 months, while negative contact and avoidance rapidly regressed to the baseline during the normalization period (T3). The boosting effect of the pandemic was particularly pronounced among children who displayed greater prejudice towards refugees before the pandemic. Findings contribute to the growing research literature delineating the potential benefits of COVID‐19 at the collective level.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Looking for your cross‐group friends after the breakout? Children's intergroup contact behaviours before and after the onset of COVID‐19

Bağcı

Yalcin

Türnüklü

et al. 2022

British J Social Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Editor-in-Chief’s introduction to the issue and volume 40 in review

Murray¹

2022

Polit. life sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General Practitioners’ Perspectives About Remote Dermatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Questionnaire-Based Study (Preprint)

Tensen¹,

Jaspers²,

Peute³

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic affected the delivery of primary care and stimulated the use of digital health solutions such as remote digital dermatology care. In the Netherlands, remote store-and-forward dermatology care was already integrated into Dutch general practice before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unclear how general practitioners (GPs) experienced this existing digital dermatology care during the pandemic period. OBJECTIVE We investigated GPs’ perspectives about facilitators and barriers related to store-and-forward digital dermatology care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, using a sociotechnical approach. METHODS In December 2021, a web-based questionnaire was distributed via email to approximately 3257 GPs who could perform a digital dermatology consultation and who had started a digital consultation (not necessarily dermatology) in the previous 2 years. The questionnaire consisted of general background questions, questions from a previously validated telemedicine service user satisfaction questionnaire, and newly added questions related to the pandemic and use of the digital dermatology service in general practice. The open-ended and free-text responses were analyzed for facilitators and barriers using content analysis, guided by an 8-dimensional sociotechnical model. RESULTS In total, 71 GPs completed the entire questionnaire, and 66 (93%) questionnaires were included in the data analysis. During the questionnaire distribution period, another national lockdown, social distancing, and stay-at-home mandates were announced; thus, GPs may have had increased workload and limited time to complete the questionnaire. Of the 66 responding GPs, 36 (55%) were female, 25 (38%) were aged 35-44 years, 33 (50%) were weekly platform users, 34 (52%) were working with the telemedicine organization for >5 years, 42 (64%) reported that they used the store-and-forward platform as often during as before the pandemic, 61 (92%) would use the platform again, 53 (80%) would recommend the platform to a colleague, and 10 (15%) used digital dermatology home consultation. Although GPs were generally satisfied with the digital dermatology service, platform, and telemedicine organization, they also experienced crucial barriers to the use of the service during the pandemic. These barriers were GPs’ and patients’ limited digital photography skills, costs and the lack of appropriate equipment, human-computer interface and interoperability issues on the telemedicine platform, and different use procedures of the digital dermatology service. CONCLUSIONS Although remote dermatology care was already integrated into Dutch GP practice before the pandemic, which may have facilitated the positive responses of GPs about the use of the service, barriers impeded the full potential of its use during the pandemic. Training is needed to improve the use of equipment and quality of (dermoscopy) images taken by GPs and to inform GPs in which circumstances they can or cannot use digital dermatology. Furthermore, the dermatology platform should be improved to also guide patients in taking photographs with sufficient quality.

show abstract

Science interrupted

Cited by 3 publications

References 33 publications

Looking for your cross‐group friends after the breakout? Children's intergroup contact behaviours before and after the onset of COVID‐19

Looking for your cross‐group friends after the breakout? Children's intergroup contact behaviours before and after the onset of COVID‐19

Editor-in-Chief’s introduction to the issue and volume 40 in review

General Practitioners’ Perspectives About Remote Dermatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Questionnaire-Based Study (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About