2012
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.626461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Education in Bhutan: Issues and challenges

Abstract: Science education in a developing country is pivotal in the developmental process. Bhutan, like other developing countries, places great importance in institutionalising a relevant and challenging science curriculum for all of its school-aged children. A number of factors have made the review of the science curriculum in Bhutan a priority including international debates about scientific literacy and the changing time and needs of Bhutanese society and its students. This article reports on the findings of a stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ahmed Fahmi (2008) reported the major factor that affected the quality of science programs in schools and beyond was the discontinuity in the pedagogy and science curriculum from primary science to higher secondary science. For instance, in lower grades, activity-based learning is emphasized whereas the predominant mode of instruction becomes direct teaching by grade 9 (Childs, Tenzin, Johnson and Ramachandran 2012). Moreover, as science in pre-primary to grade 3 is taught in Dzongkha (the National language of Bhutan) students find it difficult as they transit to grade 4 and above where science is taught in English.…”
Section: Science Education In Bhutan: Situating the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed Fahmi (2008) reported the major factor that affected the quality of science programs in schools and beyond was the discontinuity in the pedagogy and science curriculum from primary science to higher secondary science. For instance, in lower grades, activity-based learning is emphasized whereas the predominant mode of instruction becomes direct teaching by grade 9 (Childs, Tenzin, Johnson and Ramachandran 2012). Moreover, as science in pre-primary to grade 3 is taught in Dzongkha (the National language of Bhutan) students find it difficult as they transit to grade 4 and above where science is taught in English.…”
Section: Science Education In Bhutan: Situating the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many classrooms in industrialised and less developed countries lack essential conventional hands-on SEEMs (e.g., Childs, Tenzin, Johnson, & Ramachandran, 2012;Ens, Olson, Dudley, Ross, Siddiqi, Umoh et al,, 2012;Nivalainen et al, 2010;Singh & Singh, 2012). This may be explained by the fact that even in industrialised countries such as Germany and Japan, conventional SEEMs are costly, coupled with the fact that in many industrialised and less developed countries science education budgets have decreased (Poppe, Markic, & Eilks, 2011;Schaffer & Pfeifer, 2011;Set & Kita, 2014).…”
Section: Science Education Equipment and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with such calls, the use of improvised SEEMs (e.g., smallscale experiments) is an increasing trend in practical work in science classrooms in Germany (Di Fuccia et al, 2012). However, despite the willingness of some educators to improvise equipment for practical work (Childs et al, 2012), improvised SEEMs are seldom used in many ill-equipped science classrooms in secondary schools (Ezeasor et al, 2012;Sedibe, 2011;Singh & Singh, 2012). This result shows, first of all, that the improvisation of SEEMs is a strategy that can be better implemented in these classrooms.…”
Section: Purpose and Rationale Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was our job to design the questions (mostly very open) and, at the end of the process, to analyse the data and to work in collaboration with Mr Tenzin to write the final report. He also joint authored the article we published in the International Journal of Science Education (Childs, Tenzin, Johnson and Ramachandran 2012). One unintended and significant outcome of the decision by Mr Tenzin that we needed to visit schools as far east as Trashigang was that we spent many long hours in the car; it is a three day drive to Trashigang and we stopped off and visited schools in Wangdue Phodrang and Trongsa.…”
Section: Bhutan's Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key colleague that we worked with was from CAPSD was Mr Wangpo Tenzin. The process and analysis of this needs assessment has been published as Childs, Tenzin, Johnson and Ramachandran (2012).…”
Section: Bhutan's Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%