2019
DOI: 10.26818/9780814213988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Communication Online: Engaging Experts and Publics on the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And now we are beginning to see tweetorial genre innovation that is coronavirus oriented within #EpiTwitter and #MedTwitter communities. A moves analysis based in the rhetorical genre studies tradition (Mehlenbacher, 2019) makes it possible to identify the emergence and crystallization of at least four distinct tweetorial subgenres (see Table 1).…”
Section: Emergence Of the Literacy Support Tweetorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And now we are beginning to see tweetorial genre innovation that is coronavirus oriented within #EpiTwitter and #MedTwitter communities. A moves analysis based in the rhetorical genre studies tradition (Mehlenbacher, 2019) makes it possible to identify the emergence and crystallization of at least four distinct tweetorial subgenres (see Table 1).…”
Section: Emergence Of the Literacy Support Tweetorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 adapted from ElShafie, 2018): (i) connecting with your audience, (ii) raising problem awareness, (iii) relating to a practitioner's world, (iv) acknowledging remaining challenges for practice; and (v) giving a take-home message. Although this sequence is often used in science blogs (Mehlenbacher 2019), feedback results show that a focus on the management application is also useful to increase the perceived usefulness of and engagement with our visual storylines.…”
Section: Defining the Storyline Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such habituation, or “contribution to social formations,” have historically been more well-documented in “stabilized-for-now” (Schryer, 1993) genres, such as those in professional discourse and academic writing. More recently, however, scholars have shifted to question how genre interrelationships develop and function in more public contexts (e.g., Mehlenbacher, 2019; Reiff & Bawarshi, 2016). In Genre and the Performance of Publics , Reiff and Bawarshi (2016) point out that in public discourse, “the relations that hold between genres are less enforced, where genre translations are more rhizomatic and more subject to mistake, abuse, and recontextualization” (p. 12).…”
Section: Genre Uptake and Relationships Between Genresmentioning
confidence: 99%