Science and Orthodox Christianity: An Overview

Abstract

This essay offers an overview of the history of the relations between science and Eastern Christianity based on Greek-language sources. The civilizations concerned are the Byzantine Empire, the Christian Orthodox communities of the Ottoman Empire, and modern Greece, as a case study of a national state. Beginning with the Greek Church Fathers, the essay investigates the ideas of theologians and scholars on nature. Neoplatonism, the theological debates of Iconoclasm and Hesychasm, the proposed union of the Eastern and Western Churches, and the complex relations with the Hellenic past all had notable impacts on the conception of science held by the Byzantine Orthodox. From the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries, the Christian Orthodox world did not actively participate in the making of the new science that was developing in modern Europe. It had to deal with the assimilation of scientific ideas produced by Western Christianity, and its main concern was the “legitimacy” of knowledge that did not originate directly from its own spiritual tradition. Finally, with regard to the Greek state, beyond the specific points of contact between the sciences and Orthodox Christianity—pertaining, for example, to materialism, evolution, and the calendar—the essay presents the constant background engagement with religion visible in most public pronouncements of scientists and intellectuals.

The Relationships between Scientific and Theological Discourses at the Crossroads between Medieval and Early Modern Times and the Historiography of Science

“…Historiography on the different historical developments of science in the worlds of the Eastern and Western Churches has detected in the historical evolution of conceptions of sin and deification the key factors influencing the developments of science in Eastern and Western Christianity (Harrison 2016;Nicolaidis et al 2016;). As Peter Harrison points out, the Western side, much more than the East, inherited an Augustinian approach toward the Incarnation of Christ, understood as a means of paying dues to God in reparation for original and actual sin.…”

Pope Francis vs. Patriarch Bartholomew to Achieve Global Environmental Sustainability: Theoretical Insights Supported by Empirical Results

“…In contrast, Patriarch Bartholomew is close to strong sustainability paradigm, where the moral standing of nature is based on an immanent God rather than on a duty to future generations. In particular, frugality is supported by the sanctity of nature combined with panentheism (i.e., the belief that God is greater than the universe and God both includes and is part of it) [73,74].…”