2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scoms.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schweizer Konstruktionen europäischer Identität im Vergleich. Eine Analyse nationaler Mediendiskurse zu Erweiterungen und Vertiefungen der EU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the construction of belonging and in contrast to previous studies (Eilders and Lichtenstein, 2015;Lichtenstein, 2016), all analyzed countries showed a low level in their sense of belonging to the EU. This is particularly noteworthy with regard to the frame of the EU as a community united by political values.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the construction of belonging and in contrast to previous studies (Eilders and Lichtenstein, 2015;Lichtenstein, 2016), all analyzed countries showed a low level in their sense of belonging to the EU. This is particularly noteworthy with regard to the frame of the EU as a community united by political values.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The coding of frames was based on a comprehensive catalogue of 28 sub frames that were later aggregated into eight main frames. The catalogue of frames is deduced from the literature on European identity and has already proved to be appropriate in previous content analyses (Lichtenstein, 2014;2016;Lichtenstein and Eilders, 2015). 2 Three main frames refer to conflicts in EU politics and entail two identity options each.…”
Section: Design and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations