1953
DOI: 10.1126/science.118.3066.382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schwarzschild-Villiger Effect in Microspectrophotometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1953
1953
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous communications (32,34), Naora has pointed out the possible existence of the Schwarzschild-Villiger effect in the equipment hitherto employed and he constructed the improved apparatus in which this effect is eliminated. It should be noted that the involvement of Schwarzschild-Villiger effect was challenged by Ornstein and Pollister (42) who were, in turn, critically answered by Lison (28), and Naora (35).…”
Section: A Estimation Of Relative Dna Content Of Individual Nudeimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous communications (32,34), Naora has pointed out the possible existence of the Schwarzschild-Villiger effect in the equipment hitherto employed and he constructed the improved apparatus in which this effect is eliminated. It should be noted that the involvement of Schwarzschild-Villiger effect was challenged by Ornstein and Pollister (42) who were, in turn, critically answered by Lison (28), and Naora (35).…”
Section: A Estimation Of Relative Dna Content Of Individual Nudeimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…identical to one given without derivation by Lison (1953), would also be valid if the specimen almost filled the finite field illuminated, but the glare would be reduced. If the intensity of the glare falling on the image of the specimen is assumed to be proportional to the illuminated, specimen-free area from which the glare originates, the glare Ff with a finite illuminated area would be related to the glare F, found with an infinitely large illuminated area (or an infinitesimally small object) by the approximate expression.…”
Section: -Fmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Reflections and scattering at glass-air surfaces, and hence glare, can be minimized by attention to the cleanliness of lenses, microscope slides and coverslips (Caspersson, in discussion of paper by Exner, 1960). Lison (1953) further notes that under similar conditions of illumination different objectives can give very different amounts of glare (Table l), so that selection of suitable lenses can reduce the error considerably. Keohane & Metcalf (1959) and Chamberlain & Walker (1965) found that in general reflecting objectives give less glare than do refracting lenses, which have a greater number of glass-air surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may account for some of the discrepancies in the ]iterature concerning the effect of condenser angle on flare error (8,11,22).…”
Section: Transmission Of Convergent Light Through a Parallel-sided Sementioning
confidence: 99%