2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.104065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric from scattering amplitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the coherent state is gauge invariant, while the quantum operator may not be (in quantum gravity, only asymptotic observables may be associated with gauge-invariant operators). This procedure would allow us to perturbatively construct the Schwarzschild metric, along the lines of [66,146,147] but in a manifestly on-shell formalism; see also [6] for an alternative approach based on an intermediate matching with an effective theory of sources coupled to gravitons. We leave this programme for future work.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)268mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the coherent state is gauge invariant, while the quantum operator may not be (in quantum gravity, only asymptotic observables may be associated with gauge-invariant operators). This procedure would allow us to perturbatively construct the Schwarzschild metric, along the lines of [66,146,147] but in a manifestly on-shell formalism; see also [6] for an alternative approach based on an intermediate matching with an effective theory of sources coupled to gravitons. We leave this programme for future work.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)268mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the generation of gravitational waves. The associated amplitudes may have more matter sources but only one outgoing graviton [6,47,51,105,106], making them suitable for the techniques presented (see [34] for a recent discussion of retarded vs Feynman propagators in this context). They are controlled to some extent by soft factorization [46]: Indeed the amplitude M 3 treated here is the simplest instance of such, where the Coulomb poles of the soft factor 1 u•k±i are equivalent to the delta function δ(u • k).…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a novel body of research has shown that dynamical observables for compact bodies in GR, such as black holes, can be derived from massive QFT particles interacting with gravitons, see e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This entails that such spacetimes can be treated as perturbations of flat space sourced by these particles: Perturbative precission is attained by evaluating the classical limit of scattering amplitudes to the desired order in G. Pushing the state-of-the-art accuracy in GR, the correspondence has mainly emerged through the evaluation of observables such as radiated momentum, waveforms, or on-shell effective actions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a much less ambiguous option is to ultraboost the source of the initial metric, then feed the result back into the Einstein equations to obtain a metric. 6 The source of the Kerr metric was investigated long ago by Israel, who argued that Kerr is sourced by an equatorial disk of mass M whose radius is given by the spin parameter a [59,60]. 7 This description was also confirmed in a precise distributional analysis by Balasin and Nachbagauer some years later [69].…”
Section: Ultraboosting the Source Of Kerrmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The first attempt in this direction goes back to work by Duff [1], where the Schwarzschild solution in harmonic coordinates was derived to order G 2 N . This approach can also be implemented through unitarity techniques [2], and similar methods can be used to obtain other solutions such as Reissner-Nordström and Kerr [3] as well as quantum corrections, higher-order corrections and higher-dimensional generalizations [4][5][6]. Other approaches have focused instead on effective field theory techniques for the derivation of these solutions [7,8] or the use of one-point functions for the extraction of the large distance behaviour [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%