2014
DOI: 10.7153/jmi-08-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schur m-power convexity of generalized Hamy symmetric function

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we investigate the Schur m-power convexity of the generalized hamy symmetric function1 r for x ∈ R n + and r ∈ N with 1 r n , which generalizes some known results.Mathematics subject classification (2010): 05E05, 26B25.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some papers written on this topic; for instance, Yang [39][40][41] discussed the Schur m-power convexity of Stolarsky means, Gini means, and Daróczy means, respectively. Wang and Yang [42,43] studied the Schur m-power convexity of generalized Hamy symmetric function and some other symmetric functions. Wang, Fu, and Shi [44], Yin, Shi, and Qi [45], and Kumar and Nagaraja [46] investigated the Schur mpower convexity for some special mean of two variables.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some papers written on this topic; for instance, Yang [39][40][41] discussed the Schur m-power convexity of Stolarsky means, Gini means, and Daróczy means, respectively. Wang and Yang [42,43] studied the Schur m-power convexity of generalized Hamy symmetric function and some other symmetric functions. Wang, Fu, and Shi [44], Yin, Shi, and Qi [45], and Kumar and Nagaraja [46] investigated the Schur mpower convexity for some special mean of two variables.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then sgn (( 1 − 2 )/ ( 1 − 2 )) = 1, (i.e., ( ; 1 , 2 ) > 0.) Remark 12 (see [10]). By Lemma 11, we see that…”
Section: Definitions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following lemma is clearly due to the monotonicity property of the function on R ++ . Lemma 11 (see [10]). For 1 , 2 > 0 with 1 ̸ = 2 , let be defined by…”
Section: Definitions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linkers of the compounds in Figure S1 and Figure S2 include the ether, alkene, and the amide moieties. Among these, the amide linker is a privileged linker given its druglike properties. , The amide linker was first disclosed by Incyte and later on adopted by several other groups and companies (Figure S1 and Figure S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NFAT assay, the compounds had an EC 50 (half-maximal effective concentration) below 1000 nM, with 79% of the compounds having an EC 50 cutoff below 300 nM (Table ). Such data are not found in publications. The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with an EC 50 above this cutoff are not considered potent enough to stimulate T cells to clinically relevant anticancer activity. Our most potent compound, 2 , features exceptionally high target affinity and demonstrated potency in cell-based assays with an EC 50 of 21.8 nM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%