Jugend, Schule Und Identität 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-03670-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schule als Disziplinierungs- und Machtraum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, visibility in the school space is also constructed as providing security, as unsupervised and unobserved actions on the internet and the digital sphere are associated with a sense of getting lost and losing control. By addressing and negotiating the relevance of visibility, the children take up a specific characteristic of school that was elaborated and became the subject of pedagogical reflections particularly through Foucault's work on the transformation of power relations (Foucault, 1977(Foucault, /1975Grabau & Rieger-Ladich, 2014;Pongratz, 2004). This shows how the experience of contingency due to radical changes caused by the pandemic and the realization that school could be different not only reveals the panoptic structure of the traditional school as a regime of visibility, it also emphasizes its relation to schoolrelated well-being and marks this relationship (and the disciplining function of the panoptic structure) as one that becomes significant for well-being in different ways as it constrains agency on the one hand but also provides a sense of security on the other hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, visibility in the school space is also constructed as providing security, as unsupervised and unobserved actions on the internet and the digital sphere are associated with a sense of getting lost and losing control. By addressing and negotiating the relevance of visibility, the children take up a specific characteristic of school that was elaborated and became the subject of pedagogical reflections particularly through Foucault's work on the transformation of power relations (Foucault, 1977(Foucault, /1975Grabau & Rieger-Ladich, 2014;Pongratz, 2004). This shows how the experience of contingency due to radical changes caused by the pandemic and the realization that school could be different not only reveals the panoptic structure of the traditional school as a regime of visibility, it also emphasizes its relation to schoolrelated well-being and marks this relationship (and the disciplining function of the panoptic structure) as one that becomes significant for well-being in different ways as it constrains agency on the one hand but also provides a sense of security on the other hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. in Disziplinar-und Kontrollmechanismen der Schule artikulieren (Foucault, 1994). Den Zusammenhang von materiell-physischer Raumgestaltung und sozial-normativen Erwartungen analysieren Studien zur Schularchitektur (Böhme & Herrmann 2009;Yamana, 1996) sowie zur Anordnung von Dingen am Ort Schule (Grabau & Rieger-Ladich, 2014). Die normativen Erwartungen artikulieren sich strukturell auch in der Vorstellung disziplinierter Körper; die Einübung in eine dem Unterricht angemessene Lernhaltung: den Stift richtig zu halten, oder den Körper durch Tische und Stühle angemessen platzieren zu lernen, sind Beispiele hierfür (Alkemeyer, 2011;Pongratz, 2004).…”
Section: Schule Als Sozialraumunclassified
“…In our view, these degrees of freedom ( 2) become relevant when we address teacher education as a context of professionalization for the school, which can also be understood and analyzed as a 'space of disciplining and power', as Grabau and Rieger-Ladich (2014) phrase it. For our argument, two powerful moments of this space appear relevant: one of them is the naturalising of difference in the school context.…”
Section: Reflections On the Development Of Critical Reflexivity In Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%