Schuldtypisierung als Begriffsanalyse. Tiefenstrukturen moderner Praxisformen und deren strafrechtliche Transformation

Zabel, Benno

doi:10.3790/978-3-428-52247-7

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It should be the criminal action the offender commits in T2 while she or he does not have the culpability required for the offence. Therefore, alic is basically and simply considered as an exception to the principle of contemporaneity, with the aim of avoiding abuse of legal provisions accepted for protecting innocent persons (Ambos, 1997; Geilen, 1972; Gropp, 2015; Kindhäuser, 2017; Satzger, 2006; Schmidhäuser, 1992; Streng, 1994, 2001; Stühler, 1999; Zabel, 2007).…”

Section: Assessment Of Alic In Terms Of German Criminal Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Formulation of Voluntary Intoxication in Continental Law

Atalay

2020

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The principle of contemporaneity, which means the actus reus and mens rea must coincide, constitutes the backbone of criminal liability. On the contrary, it is sometimes possible for an offender to commit an offence when she or he does not have the culpability required for the committed offence. The offender can create diminished responsibility through the intake of an intoxicating substance negligently or intentionally, even with the purpose of getting rid of the punishment. To punish such an offender, a legal concept has been developed which is termed as voluntary intoxication in the Anglo-Saxon legal system, while it has been called actiones liberae in causa in the Continental Europe. In this review, actiones liberae in causa, the formulation of voluntary intoxication in the Continental European legal system, will be explained in detail and some suggestions will be made for the application of these two concepts.

show abstract

Section: Assessment Of Alic In Terms Of German Criminal Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%