2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55982-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schools, Teachers, and Training in Risk Reduction After the 2011 Tohoku Disaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, high school entrance rate is more than 97 %, and university entrance rate is more than 50 %. Oda (2016) explained that teacher training system and disaster risk reduction training opportunities in Japan with the lessons of the EJET were delivered. Education at university should also be emphasized to train students with specialized skills and knowledge.…”
Section: Key Issues For Disaster Resilience Of Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, high school entrance rate is more than 97 %, and university entrance rate is more than 50 %. Oda (2016) explained that teacher training system and disaster risk reduction training opportunities in Japan with the lessons of the EJET were delivered. Education at university should also be emphasized to train students with specialized skills and knowledge.…”
Section: Key Issues For Disaster Resilience Of Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiwaku and Shaw (2016b) introduced local governance for school disaster education through case studies (Sakurai 2016a) Governance in the national level Reflection of past disaster lessons to the national system Supports to local education authorities by the national government 3 (Shiwaku and Shaw 2016b) Governance in the local level Originalities and uniqueness of municipal governments and schools Provision of standardized materials/programs by prefectural government 4 (Fujioka 2016) School curricula Integration with environmental education and ESD Relation among science, technology, and society 5 (Oda 2016) Teacher training In-service and preservice training Comprehensive training system 6 (Nakano et al 2016) School curricula Sustainability of effects of education (students' contributions to disaster risk reduction after completion of education) Active involvement in education to be able to feel disaster situation 7 (Shiwaku and Shaw 2016c) School-community linkages Technical and fund supports by government Concrete concept and system on involvement of community 8 Evaluation and decision-making Utilization of scientific tools for PDCA cycle Multi-stakeholder discussion in decision-making process 9 (Nakamura 2016) Higher education in affected area Special course of regional rehabilitation Human resource development in recovery process 10 (Oikawa 2016) ESD and disaster risk reduction ESD-based disaster education Multi-stakeholder consortium in region 11 (Sakurai 2016b) International NGOs In formal education, government policies and strategies directly influence school education and school disaster management.…”
Section: Key Issues For Disaster Resilience Of Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past research, it is reported that the education of children is an effective strategy in the process of communicating safety-related information to the at-risk community, raising awareness, and preparing for disasters (Oda, 2016; Tekeli-Yesil et al, 2010). It is stated that the new generation of children can easily learn, they are a good channel for transferring information to their parents, and they play a critical role in developing a culture of protection from natural disasters such as earthquakes (Izadkhah and Hosseini, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, disaster recovery tends to be by the victims instead of for them. Manmade disasters such as the Okawa Elementary School (Kodama 2013;Oda 2016) and Hillsborough (Nicholson and Roebuck 1995;Scraton 2002) disasters resulted in legal battles with the government in the process of community reconstruction. In those cases, therapeutic intervention materialized as collaboration and solidarity between community members rather than through professional care practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%