2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schooling choice in South Africa: The limits of qualifications and the politics of race, class and symbolic power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…South African law states that a child may not be turned away from a public school, once admitted, on grounds of fees. The state supports over 60% of the nation’s public schools (Hunter, 2015, p. 42). Public schools that do charge fees enjoy relative autonomy and can practise selective admission.…”
Section: Comparative Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…South African law states that a child may not be turned away from a public school, once admitted, on grounds of fees. The state supports over 60% of the nation’s public schools (Hunter, 2015, p. 42). Public schools that do charge fees enjoy relative autonomy and can practise selective admission.…”
Section: Comparative Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, good township schools are scarce and scattered while there is more choice for the more centrally located neighbourhoods. As a result, there is a lot of home-to-school mobility – children being bussed to schools outside their neighbourhoods – which arguably has done more for school desegregation than changes in residential patterns (Hofmeyr, 2000; Hunter, 2015).…”
Section: Comparative Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%