Schoolchildren’s Compensatory Strategies and Skills in Relation to Attention and Executive Function App Training

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the importance of attention and executive functions (EF) in children’s behavior, programs aimed at improving these processes are of special interest. Nexxo-training combines the use of the Nexxo touchscreen application (inhibition and vigilance tasks) with procedural metacognitive strategies (imparted by an instructor) for all the individuals using the app, regardless of their level of ability, plus compensatory strategies based on individual child performance. This study presents an analysis of the compensatory strategies that schoolchildren (aged 6–8 years old) receive when experiencing difficulties with EF tasks, in addition to an analysis of the developmental factors and cognitive skills that may modulate EF task performance.MethodsFor this study, we use data from a previous randomized active-controlled study (under review), in which forty-six typically developing children aged between 6 and 8 years old (24 girls/22 boys) were enrolled in the training group. The selected children were in the 1st grade (n = 28, truex¯ = 78.32 ± 4.037 months) and 3rd grade of primary education (n = 18, truex¯ = 102.11 ± 3.445). We collected data on EF training performance, compensatory strategies needed and neuropsychological assessments.ResultsA total of 80.43% participants required some form of compensatory strategy during training. Regarding required compensatory strategies, those who had lower scores in EF training needed more compensatory strategies, in particular, instructional comprehension (r = −0.561, p < 0.001 for inhibition-tasks; r = −0.342, p < 0.001 for vigilance-tasks). Concerning developmental factors, age significantly predicted better performance in both EF tasks (β = 0.613, p < 0.001 for inhibition; β = 0.706, p < 0.001 for attention). As regards task performance, those with better performance in inhibition tasks also had better performance in vigilance tasks (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Finally, regarding cognitive skills, participants with higher performance in fluid intelligence (Q1, n = 12) had higher scores (U = 14.5, p < 0.05) than the group with the lowest performance (Q4, n = 11) in vigilance.ConclusionAs previous literature suggests, inhibition is one of the core processes of EF. Therefore, we should focus training on the core EF processes. Inhibition and vigilance are closely related processes. In terms of the use of compensatory strategies, these are more needed for participants with lower levels of performance in inhibition or vigilance. Regarding strategy analysis, instructional comprehension and self-instruction (goal setting and planning) seem to be the most useful strategies for those with difficulties in inhibitory and vigilance task performance. Regarding development, as expected, age moderates task performance in inhibition and attention. Finally, cognitive skills, such as fluid intelligence and cognitive flexibility, predicted better results in attention. EF training using not only an app, but also compensatory strategies based on user performance, is a new research direction offe...

Early-childhood temperament moderates the prospective associations of coping with adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms

“…Our results suggest that, for some youth, particularly those high in frustration and low in executive control, additional or alternative emotion regulation strategies might be needed to support effective coping. Interventions might incorporate compensatory strategies or training to enhance inhibitory control (e.g., Rossignoli-Palomeque et al, 2019 ) or mindfulness practices (e.g., Long et al, 2021 ) to complement cognitive-behavioral coping strategies. Consideration of individual temperament differences in the delivery of coping enhancement or clinical intervention can support better emotion regulation and mental health.…”

I can look for it! Modulation of a concurrent Visual Working Memory task in Visual Search in development

“…However, the participants can generate them at will. Children from 4th grade onward can use strategies, but younger children cannot develop them independently (Pérez and Capilla, 2008;Rossignoli-Palomeque et al, 2020), although we can train them (Rossignoli-Palomeque et al, 2019).…”

Effect of COGNI-MACHINE computational thinking training on executive functions in children aged 9 to 11: Protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial

“…[ 30 ] compiled studies that evaluated interventions to stimulate executive functions based on computer systems. Among these interventions aimed at children, serious games can be distinguished [ [31] , [32] ], some commercial video games [ [33] , [34] ], programs based on classic tasks [ [35] , [36] ]; interventions that incorporated virtual reality technology [ 37 ], among others. The authors also found that research on computational thinking training is another area of study that has shown different effects of teaching coding and programming on children's executive functions [ [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] ].…”