2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40536-017-0037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School-level predictors for the use of ICT in schools and students’ CIL in international comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
41
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same vein, these results are good news to developing countries with limited resources to consider using computers to teach science regardless of the high learner to computer ratio. Also, our results are in agreement to Gerick, Eickelmann & Bos (2017) who contend that the higher the learner-computer ratio the lower the achievement. Currently, it is not clear as to what the results would be if the learner-computer ratio was lower than 17:1 used in this study and the effect of the delayed testing on learners' achievement and these need further studies.…”
Section: Eurasia J Math Sci and Tech Edsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the same vein, these results are good news to developing countries with limited resources to consider using computers to teach science regardless of the high learner to computer ratio. Also, our results are in agreement to Gerick, Eickelmann & Bos (2017) who contend that the higher the learner-computer ratio the lower the achievement. Currently, it is not clear as to what the results would be if the learner-computer ratio was lower than 17:1 used in this study and the effect of the delayed testing on learners' achievement and these need further studies.…”
Section: Eurasia J Math Sci and Tech Edsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Institutional leadership and attitudes have a direct bearing on student learning, as well as on teacher attitudes towards using educational technology (Cheng and Weng, 2017). This includes institutional policies on teacher professional development and the expectation of technology use within teaching and learning (Gerick, Eickelmann and Bos, 2017), policies about staffing of classes (Hill and Tyson, 2009), which may impede the development of effective relationships between educators, students and their families, as well as policies on student technology use, such as Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) programs (Adhikari, Mathrani and Scogings, 2016). It is particularly important to remain cognisant of potential digital divide issues (Adams Becker et al 2018), including student ownership and use of devices that are incompatible with institutional devices, as this can impact participation and engagement (Bond, 2019).…”
Section: Exosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers' use of ICT in class: Perceptions of school resources for ICT use both the way in which teachers use ICT for teaching and learning, and students' ICT-related learning (Fraillon et al 2014;Gerick et al 2017;Lawrence and Tar 2018). In this section, we will use data collected from teachers, school principals, and ICT coordinators to review perceptions of ICT learning environments at schools in participating ICILS 2018 countries.…”
Section: Associations Of Teachers' Use Of Digital Technologies With Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from cross-national studies have repeatedly illustrated that there are considerable differences across countries, across different subject areas, and across schools within countries, as well as between different subgroups of teachers, in particular related to age (Fraillon et al 2014;Kozma 2003;Law et al 2008). Research has also emphasized the importance of system and school factors in supporting teachers' pedagogical use of ICT (Eickelmann 2011;Gerick et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%