2017
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School-level factors associated with teacher connectedness: a multilevel analysis of the structural and relational school determinants of young people’s health

Abstract: BackgroundConducting research on the antecedents of teacher connectedness (TC) is key to inform intervention and policy that can leverage the public health potential of teachers for young people’s well-being. As part of the EU-funded Teacher Connectedness Project, this study aims to examine the contribution of a variety of school-level factors (including type of school, school size, student–teacher ratio, students per class and teacher gender).MethodsSample consisted of 5335 adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, students in Taipei who experienced a larger student–teacher ratio tended to show more anti‐bullying attitudes. These findings contrast with those of most international studies where a low student–teacher ratio has been shown to promote students' positive development (García‐Moya et al, 2018; Johnson, 2011). However, a low student–teacher ratio does not always have a negative impact on student development: When Cheema (2018) explored the relationship between mathematics literacy and self‐efficacy for students in Greece, the researcher found that an increased student–teacher ratio predicted improvements in math literacy; self‐efficacy modified the effects of student–teacher ratio on mathematics literacy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, students in Taipei who experienced a larger student–teacher ratio tended to show more anti‐bullying attitudes. These findings contrast with those of most international studies where a low student–teacher ratio has been shown to promote students' positive development (García‐Moya et al, 2018; Johnson, 2011). However, a low student–teacher ratio does not always have a negative impact on student development: When Cheema (2018) explored the relationship between mathematics literacy and self‐efficacy for students in Greece, the researcher found that an increased student–teacher ratio predicted improvements in math literacy; self‐efficacy modified the effects of student–teacher ratio on mathematics literacy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…to promote students' positive development (García-Moya et al, 2018;Johnson, 2011). However, a low student-teacher ratio does not always have a negative impact on student development: When Cheema (2018) explored the relationship between mathematics literacy and self-efficacy for students in Greece, the researcher found that an increased student-teacher ratio predicted improvements in math literacy; self-efficacy modified the effects of student-teacher ratio on mathematics literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this aspect, the humanization of communication in educational work is the basis of effective child development. It ensures the formation of ideas about a person's human dignity, attention and respect for others, and the development of a mechanism of perception and understanding of others (García-Moya et al, 2018), (García-Moya, Brooks & Spencer, 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a variety of research on adolescents' connectedness was conducted in many disciplines related to health [6,7], education [8,10] and also those related to ethnic identity [11]. In social sciences, many researchers, for instance, are more interested in studying adolescent connectedness in a school system ecology that targets students' and teachers' relationships [8,12]. Meanwhile, family connectedness focuses more on parents, siblings, and family members [11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%