2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-017-9300-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School leaders’ dilemmas and measures to instigate changes for inclusive education in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Principals are increasingly reporting the challenge of improving distributed leadership, as this model of leadership is becoming more necessary as well, considering problems with work overload, high accountability and greater expectations from the public (e.g. Poon-McBrayer 2017;Brandon et al 2018).…”
Section: Principals' Problems In the International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principals are increasingly reporting the challenge of improving distributed leadership, as this model of leadership is becoming more necessary as well, considering problems with work overload, high accountability and greater expectations from the public (e.g. Poon-McBrayer 2017;Brandon et al 2018).…”
Section: Principals' Problems In the International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Celoria [22], León and López [23], and Liang and Cohrssen [4] have also shown the lack of training of school managers to be an obstacle to creating inclusive environments, and many authors have argued for the greater involvement of these professionals in these processes [15,24,25]. According to Liang and Cohrssen [4], what is needed is critical thinking on diversity, along with a transformation of practices and recognizing that the visibility of all families and their right to participation is a question of inclusion and social justice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in international literature, there is extensive descriptive research on principals' subjective perspectives about inclusive education (Crockett et al., 2006; Graham & Spandagou, 2011; Irvine et al., 2010; Jahnukainen, 2015), attitudes towards inclusion (Boyle et al., 2013; Hadjikakou & Mnasonos, 2012; Porakari et al., 2015; Urton et al., 2014; Wood et al., 2014; Yan & Sin, 2015), and the relationship between leadership styles and attitudes towards inclusion (Al‐Mahdy & Emam, 2018; Hess & Zamir, 2016; Houser et al., 2011). Furthermore, findings from Hongkong (Poon‐McBrayer, 2017) show that school leaders struggled between benefits of inclusive education, autocratic decisions, and staff involvement. Poon‐McBrayer underscores the need to examine the socio‐political contexts of school leadership's reform decisions (Poon‐McBrayer, 2017) as these contexts build the frame of opportunities and boundaries for leadership decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, findings from Hongkong (Poon‐McBrayer, 2017) show that school leaders struggled between benefits of inclusive education, autocratic decisions, and staff involvement. Poon‐McBrayer underscores the need to examine the socio‐political contexts of school leadership's reform decisions (Poon‐McBrayer, 2017) as these contexts build the frame of opportunities and boundaries for leadership decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%