2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Employees' Experiences Implementing a Local School Wellness Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include impact and process evaluations of large-scale programs and in demonstration or feasibility trials (154,215,216); formative or operations research to understand or address specific implementation issues or bottlenecks (217,218); retrospective "lessons learned" exercises (219-221); the development and application of tools to strengthen program design and/or implementation, such as log frames, program impact pathways, and program assessment methodologies (222)(223)(224); a large number of descriptive accounts of efforts to implement interventions, programs, or policies at organizational, local, and/or national levels (225)(226)(227)(228)(229)(230); and the development of new evaluation approaches sensitive to the needs and realities of implementation (35,231). This work often is driven by the needs of program implementers (and some funders) to strengthen the extent and quality of implementation and often involves collaboration between researchers and implementers.…”
Section: Guiding Framework Principles and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include impact and process evaluations of large-scale programs and in demonstration or feasibility trials (154,215,216); formative or operations research to understand or address specific implementation issues or bottlenecks (217,218); retrospective "lessons learned" exercises (219-221); the development and application of tools to strengthen program design and/or implementation, such as log frames, program impact pathways, and program assessment methodologies (222)(223)(224); a large number of descriptive accounts of efforts to implement interventions, programs, or policies at organizational, local, and/or national levels (225)(226)(227)(228)(229)(230); and the development of new evaluation approaches sensitive to the needs and realities of implementation (35,231). This work often is driven by the needs of program implementers (and some funders) to strengthen the extent and quality of implementation and often involves collaboration between researchers and implementers.…”
Section: Guiding Framework Principles and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%