The authors propose and test the concept of categorical manipulation, a process in which subordinate group demands for greater access to highstatus categories are met with reversals in the hierarchy of existing categories. The analysis addresses a school district's response to pressure from a racial desegregation movement to improve black access to a highstatus majority-white disability category. The district complied, but it also allowed whites to migrate to a low-status majority-black category, from which blacks then were excluded. This category was enhanced with benefits desirable to whites. The original categorical hierarchy was restored during resegregation 20 years later. In categorical manipulation, subordinate groups gain greater access to high-status categories, but these categories suffer in value as dominant groups reaffiliate with previously low-status categories, which may be revised for improvements. This is different from more familiar forms of resistance to change such as symbolic compliance, ritualization, and tokenism. Rising levels of social and economic inequality have stimulated renewed interest in organizations' role in that process (Stainback, Tomaskovic-Devey, and Skaggs 2010; Zald and Lounsbury 2010; Davis 2017). An important means by 1 This study is based on work supported by the Division of Social and Economic Sciences of the National Science Foundation (grant 1154843). The authors would like to thank the AJS reviewers for valuable comments. They would also like to thank Roslyn A. Mickelson, Emily Rauscher, and ChangHwan Kim for comments on earlier drafts. Insights from Patricia A. Roos on categorical inequality in the workplace and related library research by Erin Ice supported the theoretical framing for the study.