2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0083-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School based working memory training: Preliminary finding of improvement in children's mathematical performance

Abstract: Working memory is a complex cognitive system responsible for the concurrent storage and processing of information. Ggiven that a complex cognitive task like mental arithmetic clearly places demands on working memory (e.g., in remembering partial results, monitoring progress through a multi-step calculation), there is surprisingly little research exploring the possibility of increasing young children’s working memory capacity through systematic school-based trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
42
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few have reported transfer effects on academic performance (Holmes et al, 2010;Klingberg, 2010;Gray et al, 2012;Gropper, Gotlieb, Kronitz, & Tannock, 2014). Moreover, the few studies that presented positive effects on WM capacity with transfer to school performance (Klingberg et al, 2005;Witt, 2011) have been criticized for focusing on WM training while neglecting central executive training (Morrison & Chein, 2011;Rapport, Orban, Kofler, & Friedman, 2013). Another criticism refers to the fact that the beneficial effects were specific and momentary, i.e., they were neither maintained in the long term nor generalized to other contexts, suggesting the need for broader programs or for the combination of general and specific interventions in the skills to be improved (Melby-Lervåg & Hulme, 2013;Rapport et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few have reported transfer effects on academic performance (Holmes et al, 2010;Klingberg, 2010;Gray et al, 2012;Gropper, Gotlieb, Kronitz, & Tannock, 2014). Moreover, the few studies that presented positive effects on WM capacity with transfer to school performance (Klingberg et al, 2005;Witt, 2011) have been criticized for focusing on WM training while neglecting central executive training (Morrison & Chein, 2011;Rapport, Orban, Kofler, & Friedman, 2013). Another criticism refers to the fact that the beneficial effects were specific and momentary, i.e., they were neither maintained in the long term nor generalized to other contexts, suggesting the need for broader programs or for the combination of general and specific interventions in the skills to be improved (Melby-Lervåg & Hulme, 2013;Rapport et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With children and adolescents, some studies showed a training-related effect on mathematics, measured by an academic test (Bergman-Nutley & Klingberg, 2014;Holmes & Gathercole, 2014) and on arithmetic (Witt, 2011). However, in other studies (Alloway et al, 2013;Dunning et al, 2013;Karbach et al, 2015;St Clair-Thompson, Stevens, Hunt, & Bolder, 2010), improvement in working memory did not transfer to mathematics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the growing research base on the associations among working memory and intelligence (Cornoldi & Giofre, 2014), and working memory and learning (Alloway & Copello, 2013), it is easy to see why a majority of the cognitive training programs target working memory. Certainly, most of the studies do cite improvements in working memory (Beck, Hanson, & Puffenberger, 2010; Dunning et al, 2013; Gray et al, 2012; Holmes & Gathercole, 2014; Wiest, Wong, Minero, & Pumaccahua, 2014), but pretest to post‐test gains have also been documented in fluid reasoning (Barkl, Porter, & Ginns, 2012; Jaeggi et al, 2008; Mackey, Hill, Stone, & Bunge, 2011), processing speed (Mackey et al, 2011), reading (Loosli, Buschkuehl, Perrig, & Jaeggi, 2012; Shalev, Tsal, & Mevorach, 2007), computational accuracy (Witt, 2011), and attention (Rabiner, Murray, Skinner, & Malone, 2010; Tamm, Epstein, Peugh, Nakonezny, & Hughes, 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%