2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.11.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School-based teenage pregnancy prevention programs: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, teenagers targeted in these interventions are more comparable to our sample than the Currie and Moretti (2003) sample. Several meta-analyses synthesizing the results from both randomized controlled trials and observational studies suggest that these interventions have a limited impact on adolescent behavior regarding sexual intercourse, birth control, and pregnancy (DiCenso, Griffith 2002, Bennett andAssefi 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, teenagers targeted in these interventions are more comparable to our sample than the Currie and Moretti (2003) sample. Several meta-analyses synthesizing the results from both randomized controlled trials and observational studies suggest that these interventions have a limited impact on adolescent behavior regarding sexual intercourse, birth control, and pregnancy (DiCenso, Griffith 2002, Bennett andAssefi 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite what the public may have feared, comprehensive sex and HIV education programs do not increase teen sexual intercourse (Kirby, 2002). In fact, some of these programs have shown to decrease or delay sexual intercourse and increase condom or contraceptive use among sexually active teens (Bennett & Assefi, 2005). Currently, the middle schools use an abstinence-based program while the high school uses a comprehensive sexual education program (J. Salerno, personal communication, June 23, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Karlson and Rapoff's [4] review of 40 randomized cognitive behavioral studies in pediatric populations published between 2002 and 2007 found that the mean attrition rate was 20% for initial follow-up and 32% for extended follow-up, with a range of 0%-54%. Bennett and Assifi's [5] systematic review of 19 abstinence-only and abstinence-plus interventions implemented between 1998 and 2001 yielded attrition rates ranging from a low of 2% to a high of 35%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%