2015
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2014.1004022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School-based HPV immunization of young adolescents: Effects of two brief health interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, evidence is mounting that while health belief models may influence intent to vaccinate, the effect on behavior is minimal. 30,71,80 Reminder strategies were largely successful. An interesting theme that emerged was that provider targeted interventions appeared to be most successful for HPVV series initiation while patient targeted interventions appeared to be most successful for series completion, indicating that providers pose a more significant barrier to vaccine series initiation, while patient or family barriers are a greater hindrance to series completion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, evidence is mounting that while health belief models may influence intent to vaccinate, the effect on behavior is minimal. 30,71,80 Reminder strategies were largely successful. An interesting theme that emerged was that provider targeted interventions appeared to be most successful for HPVV series initiation while patient targeted interventions appeared to be most successful for series completion, indicating that providers pose a more significant barrier to vaccine series initiation, while patient or family barriers are a greater hindrance to series completion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intent to vaccinate increased, no effect on actual behavior was observed at the 10-month follow-up. 71 Similarly, Wegwarth et al found that students at a German school randomized to receive an evidence-based "balanced" leaflet versus those randomized to a sensationalist "unbalanced" leaflet had improved understanding of the HPVV but no difference in vaccination behavior. 33 Finally, an intervention comparing the impact of using gain-or loss-framed messages among university students in the United States and found no effect on vaccine behavior.…”
Section: Table 4 Re-aim Evaluation Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while this approach eliminates some barriers to vaccination, vaccines are delivered on an individual patient basis and therefore SBHC-delivery is not as efficient as an approach that involves administration of vaccines on a single day to groups of youth. 49 Attitudes of key stakeholders in the U.S. (e.g., parents, school nurses, school administrators) about the feasibility of school-based HPV vaccination implementation are mixed, with some research showing relatively little concern among parents and administrators 48 and other research indicating uncertain support and doubts about program implementation.…”
Section: Hpv Vaccination Implementation Approaches School Based Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective approaches to increase vaccination rates are needed and school-based on-site interventions may be feasible (for a narrative review of randomized controlled trials testing educational strategies in combination with on-site vaccination, see Appendix 1: samples, intervention components, vaccinations carried out, vaccination process, outcome measures and results). Whereas there is evidence on school-based interventions to increase vaccination rates for influenza [10,11] and sexually transmitted infections/human papillomavirus (STI/HPV [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]), school-based vaccinations against diseases such as measles, polio, or pertussis have only been addressed rarely within randomized controlled designs [11]. In interventions, common theoretical concepts that were assumed to drive the intervention effects were perceived barriers and benefits (e.g., as part of Protection Motivation Theory (PMT, [20]), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT, [21,22]), and Health Belief Model (HBM, [23])) as well as perceived risk (e.g., PMT, HBM); both may be altered by knowledge and awareness strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%