The author summarizes the findings of the other articles in this feature in terms of progress made during the last decade, as well as problems remaining. The author proposes several idealistic scenarios for counselors and other human development specialists to use as guidelines for future work with people who are disabled. S ince the 1975 passage of P.L. 94-142 and subsequent related legislation, counseling and human development services directed toward individuals with disabilities have changed in some ways and remained stagnant in others. In order to explain the context within which professional counselors operate, I review several of the more significant changes that have been discussed in depth by the other authors in this issue. Following this synopsis, I describe some of the areas that remain problematic and then provide several ideal projections for the coming decade.
RECENT SIGNIFICANT ADVANCESOne of the most far-reaching changes concerning people with disabilities relates to the terminology used to describe those individuals. A growing sensitivity to the needs of the people affected is a significant result of nondiscriminatory semantics. However, the changes represent much more. They offer, in addition, a symbolic and linguistic description of how individuals are to be regarded, treated, and integrated into society. It is easy to look back 20 years and imagine with horror the symbolic representation that occurred when individuals with different degrees of mental retardation were referred to, in the clinical literature, as idiots or imbeciles! Under the shroud of such ominous terminology, is it any wonder that they were feared, avoided, and treated as less than human? Slowly but progressively, our terminology has become less toxic and more accurate, mirroring society's growing acceptance. During the past 10 years, for example, we have moved from referring to the disabled to disabled people to people with disabilities. This language represents a change in attitude in which people were viewed only in terms of their limitations to a stage in which they were seen as individuals, albeit limited ones, to the current view that people with disabilities are simply that; that they are no more homogeneous than "people with black hair."