2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-010-2117-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schluckbezogene Lebensqualität bei Mundhöhlenkarzinomen

Abstract: The German translation of the ADI is a validated and reliable method to assess swallowing-related quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire is easy to understand and contains questions regarding subjective functional impairment from oropharyngeal dysphagia, whereas symptom-specific quality of life is not as thoroughly addressed [ 19 ]. Comparable validated dysphagia-specific questionnaires in German-speaking countries include the SWAL-QOL [ 30 ] and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [ 31 ], which primarily assess swallowing-related quality of life, and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 [ 32 ], which serves as a screening rather than a monitoring tool. Regarding the SSQ, a recent work on screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adult patients with neuromuscular diseases showed that the individual item scores for most questions included in the SSQ correlated with the total SSQ score in SMA [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire is easy to understand and contains questions regarding subjective functional impairment from oropharyngeal dysphagia, whereas symptom-specific quality of life is not as thoroughly addressed [ 19 ]. Comparable validated dysphagia-specific questionnaires in German-speaking countries include the SWAL-QOL [ 30 ] and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [ 31 ], which primarily assess swallowing-related quality of life, and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 [ 32 ], which serves as a screening rather than a monitoring tool. Regarding the SSQ, a recent work on screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adult patients with neuromuscular diseases showed that the individual item scores for most questions included in the SSQ correlated with the total SSQ score in SMA [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each question can be scored 1–5 points. A value of less than 55 is considered “highly noticeable”, 55–70 “rather noticeable” and greater than 70 “not noticeable” [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für den gEAT-10 wurde diese Berechnung bisher nicht durchgeführt. Auch für das MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) [21] existiert eine deutsche Übersetzung (ADI-D), für die Validität und Reliabilität gezeigt wurde [20], die jedoch ebenfalls nur eine grobe Einteilung in "sicher auffällig", "eher auffällig" und "eher unauffällig" erlaubt. Mit 30 Items ist die Befragung jedoch aufwendiger.…”
Section: Statistische Methodenunclassified
“…An der Klinik bestanden auch Erfahrungen mit der deutschen Version (ADI-D) [20] des MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) [21], wobei auch für die deutsche Übersetzung Validität und Reliabilität gezeigt wurden [Bauer 2010]. Die deutsche Version des MDADI, ADI-D, besteht aus insgesamt 30 Fragen, die in der Originalpublikation 4 Kernbereichen zugeordnet sind, nämlich dem globalen, dem emotionalen, dem funktionellen und dem physischen.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified