2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schizophrenia and depression: The relation between sleep quality and working memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18 ] In the meantime, a good sleep can improve memory and daily living ability. [ 19 ] Meanwhile, sleep disorder is not conducive to mental rehabilitation in patients with schizophrenia. [ 20 ] Acupuncture can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with mental illness, especially sleep quality, [ 21 ] thereby to correct their psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 18 ] In the meantime, a good sleep can improve memory and daily living ability. [ 19 ] Meanwhile, sleep disorder is not conducive to mental rehabilitation in patients with schizophrenia. [ 20 ] Acupuncture can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with mental illness, especially sleep quality, [ 21 ] thereby to correct their psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impairment of WM is common in a range of psychiatric disorders including SZ and MDD and the severity of the deficit depends on diagnosis (Forbes, Carrick, McIntosh, & Lawrie, 2009; Lever, Werkle‐Bergner, Brandmaier, Ridderinkhof, & Geurts, 2015; Schwarz, Tost, & Meyer‐Lindenberg, 2016; Snyder, 2013; Yamashita et al, 2018), with greater impairments associated with higher values of a factor representing general psychopathology (Caspi et al, 2014). In the case of SZ, there have been consistent reports, including those in reviews, of the existence of WM impairment in patients relative to healthy controls (HC) (Barch & Sheffield, 2014; Kaminski et al, 2020; Kim, Glahn, Nuechterlein, & Cannon, 2004; Mayer, Stablein, Oertel‐Knochel, & Fiebach, 2018; Noort et al, 2016; Park & Gooding, 2014; Piskulic, Olver, Norman, & Maruff, 2007; Pu et al, 2019; Schaefer, Giangrande, Weinberger, & Dickinson, 2013; Schlagenhauf et al, 2008; Trapp et al, 2017). On the other hand, in the case of MDD, relative to HC, WM performance has sometimes been reported to be impaired (Chen et al, 2018; Christopher & MacDonald, 2005; Egeland et al, 2003; Liu et al, 2019; Noort et al, 2016; Pu et al, 2011; Pu et al, 2018; Schwert, Stohrer, Aschenbrenner, Weisbrod, & Schröder, 2019) or sometimes not (Channon, Baker, & Robertson, 1993; Murphy et al, 2019; Trapp et al, 2017; Yuksel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of SZ, there have been consistent reports, including those in reviews, of the existence of WM impairment in patients relative to healthy controls (HC) (Barch & Sheffield, 2014; Kaminski et al, 2020; Kim, Glahn, Nuechterlein, & Cannon, 2004; Mayer, Stablein, Oertel‐Knochel, & Fiebach, 2018; Noort et al, 2016; Park & Gooding, 2014; Piskulic, Olver, Norman, & Maruff, 2007; Pu et al, 2019; Schaefer, Giangrande, Weinberger, & Dickinson, 2013; Schlagenhauf et al, 2008; Trapp et al, 2017). On the other hand, in the case of MDD, relative to HC, WM performance has sometimes been reported to be impaired (Chen et al, 2018; Christopher & MacDonald, 2005; Egeland et al, 2003; Liu et al, 2019; Noort et al, 2016; Pu et al, 2011; Pu et al, 2018; Schwert, Stohrer, Aschenbrenner, Weisbrod, & Schröder, 2019) or sometimes not (Channon, Baker, & Robertson, 1993; Murphy et al, 2019; Trapp et al, 2017; Yuksel et al, 2018). Furthermore, WM deficits have been reported to increase over time in SZ (Fu, Czajkowski, & Torgalsboen, 2018; Jimenez‐Lopez et al, 2019; Park, Püschel, Sauter, Rentsch, & Hell, 1999; Strugstad, Lau, & Glenne Oie, 2018), but not in MDD (Nuninga et al, 2018; Sankar, Adams, Costafreda, Marangell, & Fu, 2017; Vasavada et al, 2017; Zuidersma, Comijs, Naarding, & Oude Voshaar, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, Pearson correlation analyses (two-tailed) were used to test for a possible linear relationship between the patient’s subjective quality of sleep and the patient’s pharmacological treatment. For all statistical analyses, a significance level of p < 0.05 was used [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%