Schema.org for research data managers: a primer

Enrichment of Schema.org with cultural heritage context standards for the description and processing of electronic thesis and dissertations

“…The first group is the studies that have evaluated the functionality of Schema.org vocabulary and their retrieval and visibility in different fields. Examples are studies by Mixter et al (2014), Meusel et al (2015), Friedrich (2015), Wallis et al (2017), Simsek et al (2017), Cole et al (2017), Balcı et al (2018), Freire et al (2018), Simsek et al (2018), Vidojevic (2019), Simsek et al (2020), Freire (2021), Jana and Rout (2022), Payne and Verhey (2022), Belz (2022), Wang et al (2022) and Iliadis et al (2023). These studies have concentrated on the use of the Schema.org vocabularies in describing Web resources and entities description like theses and dissertations, entity-based search, Europeana network, content enrichment with semantic data, linking to the Linked Data, Linked Open Data, Semantic annotation in the tourism domain, metadata aggregation in a cultural heritage context, resources of the human library, data managers, markup in E-commerce projects, Linked data-based machine-to-machine sales contract conclusion and models the world of search.…”