2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45876-x_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schema-Driven Evaluation of Approximate Tree-Pattern Queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approXQL [5] approach can also handle partial structural matchings. All the paths in the query are however required to occur in the document.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The approXQL [5] approach can also handle partial structural matchings. All the paths in the query are however required to occur in the document.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the user query, the approaches [2][3][4][5], for structural and content scoring of XML documents, generates relaxations of the query structure that preserve the ancestor-descendant relationships existing among nodes in the query. These relaxations do not consider the effective presence of such a structure in the collection of documents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schlieder and Meuss (2000) extend the vector space model to term vectors consisting of structured terms by generalizing tf*idf-based term weights to structured terms. The language ApproXQL (Schlieder 2002) considers structural similarity between query graphs and XML data graphs based on graph transformation and matching. Guha et al (2002) apply a tree distance measure to implement approximate joins on XML data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the large number and complexity (or heterogeneity) of XML documents, the retrieval process should be cooperative between system and user. Here approximate matches that allow to rank answers according to their relevance to the query [3,6,19,20] are more appropriate than exact match queries. Recently several proposals have therfore studied ranking methods that account for structure to score answers to XML queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%