2010
DOI: 10.1080/00207540903433874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling with controllable processing times and compression costs using population-based heuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the feature of problem and algorithm considered, we present a new encoding scheme (solution representation) based on the real number for this scheduling problem in this work. This solution representation is different from literatures [45,46]. In [45], the length of solution representation developed by them is 2n (n is the number of jobs), while our proposal is n. In [46], they adopted the largest position value (LPV) rule to denote order of job process in solution representation.…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the feature of problem and algorithm considered, we present a new encoding scheme (solution representation) based on the real number for this scheduling problem in this work. This solution representation is different from literatures [45,46]. In [45], the length of solution representation developed by them is 2n (n is the number of jobs), while our proposal is n. In [46], they adopted the largest position value (LPV) rule to denote order of job process in solution representation.…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cost optimization of project schedules has been effectively carried out by genetic algorithms (Eshtehardian et al 2009), simulated annealing (He et al 2009), tabu search (Hazir et al 2011), neural networks (Adeli and Karim 1997), ant colony optimization (Kalhor et al 2011), particle swarm optimization (Yang 2007), differential evolution (Nearchou 2010), harmony search (Geem 2010) and hybrid methods, such as genetic algorithm and dynamic programming (Ezeldin and Soliman 2009), cutting plane method and Monte Carlo simulation (Mokhtari et al 2010), genetic algorithm and simulated annealing (Sonmez and Bettemir 2012) among others. Certainly, there are also various extensions of aforesaid techniques that can be found in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…genetic algorithms [7÷12], simulated annealing [13,14], tabu search [14,15], neural networks [16], ant colony optimization [17÷20], particle swarm optimization [21], differential evolution [22], harmony search [23] mixedinteger linear programming [24÷28] and hybrid methods, such as genetic algorithm and simulated annealing [28], genetic algorithm and dynamic programming [29], cutting plane method and Monte Carlo simulation [30], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%