2004
DOI: 10.1137/s009753970037727x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling with AND/OR Precedence Constraints

Abstract: Abstract. In many scheduling applications it is required that the processing of some job be postponed until some other job, which can be chosen from a pregiven set of alternatives, has been completed. The traditional concept of precedence constraints fails to model such restrictions. Therefore, the concept has been generalized to so-called and/or precedence constraints which can cope with this kind of requirement. In the context of traditional precedence constraints, feasibility, transitivity, and the computat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an open problem whether the max atoms problem is in P, but it is known to be polynomial-time equivalent to determining the winner in mean payoff games (Möhring, Skutella, and Stork [28]), which is known to be in NP ∩ co-NP. Note that here the assumption that c is represented in binary is important: when c is represented in unary, or when we drop all but a finite number of relations in Γ , the resulting problem is known to be in P.…”
Section: Csp(γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is an open problem whether the max atoms problem is in P, but it is known to be polynomial-time equivalent to determining the winner in mean payoff games (Möhring, Skutella, and Stork [28]), which is known to be in NP ∩ co-NP. Note that here the assumption that c is represented in binary is important: when c is represented in unary, or when we drop all but a finite number of relations in Γ , the resulting problem is known to be in P.…”
Section: Csp(γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such relations have been called tropically convex in the literature [12]. 2 This class is a non trivial extension of the max-atoms problem (for instance it contains relations such as x (y + z)/2), and it is not covered by the known reduction to mean payoff games [28,1,3]. Indeed, it is open whether the CSP for tropically convex semilinear relations can be reduced to mean payoff games (in fact, Zwick and Paterson [32] believe that mean payoff games are "strictly easier" than simple stochastic games, which reduce to our problem via the results presented in Section 4).…”
Section: R E S U Lt Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are equivalent: Proof. The equivalence between 1 and 2 follows (essentially) from Lemma 7.5 in [22] (see also [4] for a proof of the exact statement). The equivalence between 2 and 3 follows from Lemma 2 in [8].…”
Section: Chaining Refutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Manuel Bodirsky for bringing [22] to our attention, and to the anonymous referees for their comments. This work was done while visiting the Centre de Recerca Matemàtica (CRM), Bellaterra, Barcelona.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since max(e 1 Another less trivial equivalence of MAP is with the problem of deciding the existence of super fixpoints of min-max functions [8]. A min-max function is a function f : Z n → Z n whose coordinates are min-max expressions, i.e., terms in the grammar A more significant relationship is with the problem of computing earliest job start times for the systems of AND/OR precedence constraints of [9]. To show PTIMEequivalence with MAP, simple syntactic transformations suffice, like interchanging min with max and with .…”
Section: Simple Equivalences With Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%