2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.disopt.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling on same-speed processors with at most one downtime on each machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an ordering where all time slots before the downtimes are considered first and all time slots after the downtimes are considered afterwards can be used. This strategy is similar to that of the LPT-based algorithm from [13]. While attempting to prove upper bounds for schedule durations of algorithms, it may happen that no set of weights can be used to cover all cases when proving certain properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, an ordering where all time slots before the downtimes are considered first and all time slots after the downtimes are considered afterwards can be used. This strategy is similar to that of the LPT-based algorithm from [13]. While attempting to prove upper bounds for schedule durations of algorithms, it may happen that no set of weights can be used to cover all cases when proving certain properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the proof of the bound's tightness from [12], the fact that there are multiple downtimes is not used, and so the bound is tight in the class of polynomial algorithms assuming that P ̸ = NP even if there can only be at most one downtime on each machine [13]. The case of uniform processors is more general than the case of same-speed processors, and so, assuming that P ̸ = NP, no polynomial algorithm can achieve a bound that is better than 3/2 for the problem we consider.…”
Section: Bound Tightnessmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We discuss this in more detail in Section 4.2. To obtain approximation results for scheduling with unavailability periods in this context, assumptions about the downtimes were made such as the assumption that only a fraction of the processors can be unavailable at the same time [1,2], or by comparing the generated schedule to the latest among the end of an optimal schedule or the latest end of a downtime, thus essentially considering scheduling with fixed jobs [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polynomial-time approximation algorithms for this problem that achieve the worst-case approximation bound of 1.5 were given for the general problem in [6]. For the case where there is at most one fixed job on each machine, significanlty simpler heuristics with lower time complexities resembling the largest processing time algorithm (LPT) [7] for identical processors and the MULTIFIT algorithm [8] for uniform processors also achieve this bound [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%