2020
DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2020.12914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling of Repetitive Construction Processes With Concurrent Work of Similarly Specialized Crews

Abstract: The highest degree of construction works harmonization can be achieved when planning a repetitive project with processes replicated many times in work zones of identical size. In practice, structural considerations affect the way of dividing the object under construction into zones differing in terms of scope and quantity of works. Due to this fact, individual processes are being allotted to different non-identical zones. Most methods intended for scheduling repetitive processes were developed with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Network-based techniques, such as CPM (critical path method), have traditionally been used for planning, scheduling, and monitoring construction projects since the late 1950s (Ammar, 2020). Despite the wide applications of CPM, it fails to schedule repetitive construction projects due to the following shortcomings: (1) CPM requires a large number of nodes to represent a repetitive construction project; (2) CPM cannot demonstrate the production rate of activities; (3) CPM does not ensure resource continuity (Long & Ohsato, 2009;Altuwaim & El-Rayes, 2018a;Jaskowski & Biruk, 2020). Therefore, many more practical scheduling techniques have been developed for scheduling repetitive construction projects, such as Line of balance (LOB) (Arditi et al, 2001), linear scheduling method (LSM) (Harmelink & Rowings, 1998;Rogalska & Hejducki, 2007), and production scheduling method (PSM) (Lucko, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network-based techniques, such as CPM (critical path method), have traditionally been used for planning, scheduling, and monitoring construction projects since the late 1950s (Ammar, 2020). Despite the wide applications of CPM, it fails to schedule repetitive construction projects due to the following shortcomings: (1) CPM requires a large number of nodes to represent a repetitive construction project; (2) CPM cannot demonstrate the production rate of activities; (3) CPM does not ensure resource continuity (Long & Ohsato, 2009;Altuwaim & El-Rayes, 2018a;Jaskowski & Biruk, 2020). Therefore, many more practical scheduling techniques have been developed for scheduling repetitive construction projects, such as Line of balance (LOB) (Arditi et al, 2001), linear scheduling method (LSM) (Harmelink & Rowings, 1998;Rogalska & Hejducki, 2007), and production scheduling method (PSM) (Lucko, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors, such as Chan (1997) [6], Al-Ghafly (1999) [7], Al-Momani (2000) [8], Iyer and Jha (2005) [9], Sadi and Sadiq (2006) [10], El-Razek et al (2008) [11], Al-Kharashi and Skitmore (2009) [12], Olawale and Sun (2010) [13], Chang et al (2011) [14], Geraldine (2012) [15], Lee et al (2013) [16], Ramanathan (2018) [17] focused their research on the subjects and listed more than 100 factors that can affect the construction progress. Other scholars turned their interest into technical problems that cause delays in construction [18]. For instance, rework is responsible for the delay that averages 22% of scheduled time [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available related research studies focused on: (1) investigating the impact of renovation on hotels performance [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], (2) improving the planning of renovation work in existing buildings [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], and (3) optimizing the planning of repetitive construction projects [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%