1994
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90209-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling jobs with release times on a machine with finite storage

Abstract: Consider a single machine with a buffer which can store up to b waiting jobs for some fixed b. Given the release times, the weights and the processing times of n consecutive jobs, a maximum weight subset of jobs is to be found that is schedulable without violating the buffer's capacity constraint. A polynomial algorithm for the unweighted loss-delay problem is presented. The weighted case is shown to be NP-hard as well as an unweighted two-machine version.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof Nawijn et al [8] prove that the recognition version of problem 1|b I = b, r j , d j = ∞, s j = 1|∑w j U j is binary NP-complete. Examination of their constructed instance of that problem shows that the use of preemptions does not reduce the optimal cost.…”
Section: |mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof Nawijn et al [8] prove that the recognition version of problem 1|b I = b, r j , d j = ∞, s j = 1|∑w j U j is binary NP-complete. Examination of their constructed instance of that problem shows that the use of preemptions does not reduce the optimal cost.…”
Section: |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nawijn [7] studies a nonpreemptive, finite capacity input buffer problem in which the jobs that are not lost are processed in their order of arrival. Also, Nawijn et al [8] derive a polynomial time algorithm for the nonpreemptive problem of minimizing the number of lost jobs when the buffer capacity is a positive constant. They prove that the problem of minimizing the weighted number of lost jobs is binary NPhard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%