2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1569-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling hybrid flowshops with sequence dependent setup times to minimize makespan and maximum tardiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be used several criteria to compare algorithms which are CPU Time, relative deviation index (RDI), relative percentage deviation (RPD) and the best solution. RDI and RPD can be calculated as (Naderi et al 2009):…”
Section: Comparison Of Solution Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used several criteria to compare algorithms which are CPU Time, relative deviation index (RDI), relative percentage deviation (RPD) and the best solution. RDI and RPD can be calculated as (Naderi et al 2009):…”
Section: Comparison Of Solution Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2, we based the number of jobs in our experiments on previous flowshop scheduling research by Naderi et al (2009). Following from the classical problem introduced by Taillard (1990) and revisited by Ruiz et al (2005) we used uniformly distributed processing times in the experiments.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is any machine fault, the original scheduling scheme may no longer be the optimal one and needs to be redesigned, which means, re-scheduling strategy needs to be used to address the uncertainties in flow shop scheduling brought by product blockage and machine faults [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%