1992
DOI: 10.2307/2691356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling a Bridge Club (A Case Study in Discrete Optimization)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution representations for the BC problem are based in the matrix representations proposed in (Simpson, 1997) (Elenbogen and Maxim, 1992) (representation R a ) and a new representation (representation R c that fixes the group A in the initial solution in the first column of the representation proposed by (Elenbogen and Maxim, 1992).…”
Section: Simulated Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The solution representations for the BC problem are based in the matrix representations proposed in (Simpson, 1997) (Elenbogen and Maxim, 1992) (representation R a ) and a new representation (representation R c that fixes the group A in the initial solution in the first column of the representation proposed by (Elenbogen and Maxim, 1992).…”
Section: Simulated Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem, in appearance simple, arises as a complex problem when solved by an exact approach. The Bridge Club problem and its optimal solution are defined in (Elenbogen and Maxim, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several papers have dealt with the construction or existence of balanced incomplete block designs (BIBDs) [14] and [3], and 2-concurrence designs [5,7,9,10,11,13] as an optimization problem. Also the author of [3] used genetic algorithms (optimization method) to ®nd difference sets that were required in order to locate seating diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our TS algorithm was able to construct many difference families. In particular, we constructed six new difference families (see [2]) which lead to an equal number of new BIBDs with parameters: (49,98,18,9,3), (61,122,20,10,3), (46,92,20,10,4), (45,90,22,11,5), (85,255,24,8,2) and (34, 85, 30, 12, 10) (see [8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%