“…At the same time, we should note that the publications by Echchabi et al (2021) and Mazambani and Mutambara (2019) merely validated the TPB constructs of perceived behavioral control, attitude and subjective norm in the context and thus heavily overlooked other important idiosyncratic factors such as individual disposition to trust, risk and skepticism that could prove to be contextually relevant, especially when making decisions about whether to engage in risky investments such as cryptocurrencies According to a recent review of the literature on cryptocurrency (Angerer et al 2020), individuals' perception of risk is a major concern, suggesting the need to empirically validate the role that risk disposition potentially plays in cryptocurrency investment decision-making. Similarly, our decision to further extend TPB with both individual's disposition to trust and skepticism toward cryptocurrency investment has been informed by past research such as those of Arli et al (2021) and Gupta et al (2021) who highlighted the importance of trust in cryptocurrency acceptance/investment intentions as well as the research of Chouk and Mani (2019) that highlights the extent to which consumer skepticism towards a less-familiar product eventually hinders the product acceptance (see also Hajiheydari et al 2021). As a result, our specific objective in this study is to extend TPB to the current context but also expand the theory by incorporating idiosyncratic factors, otherwise known as individual traits, and including individual disposition to risk, trust, and skepticism in the investigation of individuals' willingness to invest in cryptocurrency.…”