2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ScePT: Scene-consistent, Policy-based Trajectory Predictions for Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The representative trajectory prediction frameworks applying these designs are, e.g., Social-GAN [34], DESIRE [35], and Precog [36], respectively. Due to the relatively easy training process and good performance, many recent works [37], [13], [38], [39] extend the CVAE-based design for multimodal trajectory prediction. However, these sampling-based approaches do not provide a straightforward mechanism to estimate the likelihood of each prediction in the random sampling process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The representative trajectory prediction frameworks applying these designs are, e.g., Social-GAN [34], DESIRE [35], and Precog [36], respectively. Due to the relatively easy training process and good performance, many recent works [37], [13], [38], [39] extend the CVAE-based design for multimodal trajectory prediction. However, these sampling-based approaches do not provide a straightforward mechanism to estimate the likelihood of each prediction in the random sampling process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make a fair comparison, we only benchmark our model GATraj with multi-path trajectory prediction models. Namely, they are convolutional based multi-path trajectory prediction models CoverNet [5] and MTP [44]; GANbased model Social-GAN [34]; CVAE-based models DLow-AF [45] and ScePT [39]; Normalizing flow-based model LDS-AF [46]; GCN-based models STAR [47]; GMM-based models MultiPath [48] and Trajectron++ [40]; attentionbased models SoPhie [10], AgentFormer [13], MID [26]; clustering-based model PCCSNet [49]; belief energy-based model LB-EBM [50]. It should be noted that some of the baseline models [10], [44], [48] also include scene information.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metrics and Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observe a proliferation of algorithms [32,31,23,42,27] that try to optimize the path prediction for a single context and perspective. Most existing approaches focus on an isolated domain and fail to evaluate the generality of their solution over different contexts and domains [4,25,31]. It is rare to see approaches that predict for both vehicles and pedestrians [30,4], and it is only recently that select pedestrian focused approaches started using both bird's-eye and high-angle views [11,22,21,20,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing approaches focus on an isolated domain and fail to evaluate the generality of their solution over different contexts and domains [4,25,31]. It is rare to see approaches that predict for both vehicles and pedestrians [30,4], and it is only recently that select pedestrian focused approaches started using both bird's-eye and high-angle views [11,22,21,20,17]. When it comes to real-world deployment and applications, a general domainagnostic approach that can accurately predict both pedestrians and vehicles across different views and perspectives is highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%