2015
DOI: 10.1159/000366054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scene Categorization in Alzheimer's Disease: A Saccadic Choice Task

Abstract: Aims: We investigated the performance in scene categorization of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) using a saccadic choice task. Method: 24 patients with mild AD, 28 age-matched controls and 26 young people participated in the study. The participants were presented pairs of coloured photographs and were asked to make a saccadic eye movement to the picture corresponding to the target scene (natural vs. urban, indoor vs. outdoor). Results: The patients' performance did not differ from chance for natural sce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the included studies, seven studies incorporated goal-directed paradigms with naturalistic stimuli [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 71 , 74 , 76 ]. Moreover, whilst Coco et al [ 69 ] and Shakespeare et al [ 73 ] incorporated tasks that were naturalistic by nature (e.g., free image search), the duration of the image presentation was insufficient for the participant to engage in free visual exploration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the included studies, seven studies incorporated goal-directed paradigms with naturalistic stimuli [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 71 , 74 , 76 ]. Moreover, whilst Coco et al [ 69 ] and Shakespeare et al [ 73 ] incorporated tasks that were naturalistic by nature (e.g., free image search), the duration of the image presentation was insufficient for the participant to engage in free visual exploration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resultantly, 39 papers passed through full-text screening and were identified as being relevant to our research question [ 25 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD participants had a formal diagnosis of dementia due to AD and met the requirements for the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) for AD. MCI participants met the following criteria [ 35 ] and had a diagnosis of dementia due to mild cognitive impairment: (1) subjective reports of memory decline (reported by the individual or caregiver/informant); (2) memory and/or cognitive impairment (scores on standard cognitive tests were >1.5 SDs below age norms); (3) activities of daily living were preserved. The following exclusion criteria were applied: patients with acute physical symptoms, focal cerebral lesions, history of neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy), cerebrovascular disorders (including ischemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, atherosclerosis), psychosis, active or past alcohol or substance misuse/dependence or any physical or mental condition severe enough to interfere with their ability to participate in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the patients were able to execute the task as correctly as the HOAs were suggests that our results on engagement delays are unlikely to be explained by other factors, such as altered visual search strategies (Foldi et al, 1992;Nebes and Brady, 1989;Porter et al, 2010;Rösler et al, 2000;Tales et al, 2004), lack of motivation (Modrego, 2010;Starkstein, 2006), impaired object discrimination (Boucart et al, 2014a), scene categorization (Lee et al, 2007;Lenoble et al, 2015), or forgetfulness. In addition, patients with AD rated emotional targets as more negative and arousing than neutral targets, suggesting that, similar to the control groups, they were able to correctly discriminate target content.…”
Section: Selective Impairment Of Attentional Engagement Toward Negatimentioning
confidence: 79%