2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40309-019-0160-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenarios in the strategy process: a framework of affordances and constraints

Abstract: This paper challenges the solely rational view of the scenario technique as a strategy and foresight tool designed to cope with uncertainty by considering multiple possible future states. The paper employs an affordance-based view that allows for the identification and structuring of hidden, emergent attributes of the scenario technique beyond the intended ones. The suggested framework distinguishes between affordances (1) that are intended by the organization and relate to its goals, (2) that emergently gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
(238 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, apart from past and present, also future customer wants and needs could provide a valuable source of insights into entrepreneurial opportunities. Especially the scenario technique could enable entrepreneurs to explore alternate future developments (Tiberius 2019) which contain novel opportunities. Dealing with divergent future scenarios can also enhance creativity (Rohrbeck and Gemünden 2011) beneficial for the opportunity recognition and especially creation process.…”
Section: Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, apart from past and present, also future customer wants and needs could provide a valuable source of insights into entrepreneurial opportunities. Especially the scenario technique could enable entrepreneurs to explore alternate future developments (Tiberius 2019) which contain novel opportunities. Dealing with divergent future scenarios can also enhance creativity (Rohrbeck and Gemünden 2011) beneficial for the opportunity recognition and especially creation process.…”
Section: Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As radical innovations are absolutely novel rather than based on existing predecessors, it makes sense not only to concentrate on “what is”, but also “what could be”. Apart from knowledge about current customer wants and needs, current structure of competition, and available technologies, strategic foresight ( Fergnani, 2020 , Iden et al, 2017 , Rohrbeck et al, 2015 , Semke and Tiberius, 2020 ), and, more specifically, the use of the scenario technique ( Tiberius, 2019 , Tiberius et al, 2020 ), could explore multiple future developments which do not represent factual knowledge but rather mental images. Rather than forecasting the most probable future state ( Cuhls, 2003 ), the occupation with alternative possibilities might not only allow for a better future preparedness ( Rohrbeck & Kum, 2018 ) but also increase creativity ( Rohrbeck & Gemünden, 2011 ) as an antecedent of (radical) innovation ( Anderson, Potočnik, & Zhou, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars also examine cognitive and behavioral aspects which can be observed when the scenario technique is used by (groups of) individuals. We see a potential to address further benefits and side-effects of scenarios in future research ( Tiberius, 2019 ). Especially, scenario-based foresight seems to enhance a firm’s dynamic capabilities ( Haarhaus and Liening, 2020 , Schwarz et al, 2019 , Semke and Tiberius, 2020 ), which needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scenario technique is an established method to cope with uncertainty by exploring multiple alternate future situations for strategic and operational planning purposes ( Godet, 2000 , Schoemaker, 1993 , Schoemaker, 1995 , Wright and Goodwin, 2009 , Tiberius, 2019 ). The method allows firms to adapt to dynamic environments and to enhance innovativeness ( Rohrbeck and Gemünden, 2011 , Worthington et al, 2009 ) and firm performance ( Phelps et al, 2001 , Rohrbeck and Kum, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%