2010 21st Australian Software Engineering Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/aswec.2010.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario-Based Validation: Beyond the User Requirements Notation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…]" Indeed, most model-based approach to testing [15] enable testability, that is, the generation of non-executable test purposes. Consequently, Arnold and Corriveau have discussed at length elsewhere [16] how to augment the URN modeling puzzle above to address requirements verification. In a nutshell, we suggest:…”
Section: Model-driven Requirements Verificationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…]" Indeed, most model-based approach to testing [15] enable testability, that is, the generation of non-executable test purposes. Consequently, Arnold and Corriveau have discussed at length elsewhere [16] how to augment the URN modeling puzzle above to address requirements verification. In a nutshell, we suggest:…”
Section: Model-driven Requirements Verificationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ACL is a high-level contract language that is closely tied to the concept of requirements. It was developed by Arnold and Corriveau (2010a, 2010b, 2010c and offers several constructs, in particular scenarios and responsibilities, for system-level modeling.…”
Section: Research Question Thesis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specification language that is used for this thesis is called Another Contract Language (ACL). It was put forth by Arnold and Corriveau (2010a, 2010b, 2010c. In this section, we summarize the essential aspects of it through a simple example.…”
Section: Another Contract Language (Acl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACL is a high-level, implementation-independent specification language, the goal of which was to provide a new approach to a testable requirements model (TRM) [10,22,23]. It is a textual specification and is intended to be implemented after the necessary user requirements notation (URN) specifications have been developed.…”
Section: Another Contract Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, ACL is intended to be written based on refinements of the responsibilities, scenarios, and metrics of goal-oriented requirements language (GRL) and use case map (UCM) diagrams (developed from use cases) [22].…”
Section: Another Contract Languagementioning
confidence: 99%