2012
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario-based multiobjective distribution feeder reconfiguration considering wind power using adaptive modified particle swarm optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies were performed by Niknam et al [30] to work out several scenarios, taking into account the uncertainty of wind speed, power injection by wind turbines, and varying both active and reactive loads. A WeibullGaussian probabilistic distribution function was used to identify the scenarios stochastically.…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies were performed by Niknam et al [30] to work out several scenarios, taking into account the uncertainty of wind speed, power injection by wind turbines, and varying both active and reactive loads. A WeibullGaussian probabilistic distribution function was used to identify the scenarios stochastically.…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active loss reduction [1][2], load equalization and power restoration optimization are currently the most popular technical methods for distribution network reconfiguration, the main objective of which is loss reduction. Regarding optimization algorithms, the differential evolution algorithm [3][4], particle swarm algorithm [5], genetic algorithm [6] and so on [7] have been widely applied. A reconfiguration algorithm of a distribution network based on an improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm is proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical perspective, a network reconfiguration is an optimisation problem which may have different objective functions, such as minimum switching operations, minimum power loss, balanced feeder load balancing, or their combination [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] to comply with a set of operational constraints such as bus bar voltage limits, line or cable capacity ratings and fault levels. Generally these methods can be grouped into several categories; classic optimization technique [10][11][12][13], sensitivities analysis method [14], knowledge-based heuristic method [15][16][17][18], and Genetic Algorithms [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%