2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scatttering of High-Energy Particles at a Collisionless Shock Front: Dependence on the Shock Angle

Abstract: Many shock acceleration theories deal with gyrophase-averaged particle distributions that depend only on the energy and pitchangle of the particles. Diffusive shock acceleration includes shock crossing as a necessary component. As long as the shock width is much smaller than the mean free path of a particle, the crossing is governed by the macroscopic fields inside the transition layer. The dynamics of high-energy particles in these fields is non-adiabatic and gyrophase dependent. The magnetic moment is not c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have analyzed in detail ion dynamics in marginally critical quasi-perpendicular shocks. The parameters of the analyzed shocks are typical for more than 60% of interplanetary shocks, according to the list of 2007-2015 STEREO shocks by Lan Jian at http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/forms/stereo/stereo_level_3.html (see also Neugebauer [2013] and Gedalin et al [2015b]). 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have analyzed in detail ion dynamics in marginally critical quasi-perpendicular shocks. The parameters of the analyzed shocks are typical for more than 60% of interplanetary shocks, according to the list of 2007-2015 STEREO shocks by Lan Jian at http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/forms/stereo/stereo_level_3.html (see also Neugebauer [2013] and Gedalin et al [2015b]). 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows subscripts u and d refer to the upstream and downstream regions, respectively. For a low‐Mach number shock, we shall apply the following model of a monotonic shock profile without additional structure [see, e.g., Gedalin et al , ]: bz=BzBusinθ=12[](R+1)+(R1)G()xD by=ByBu=CBy()cosθM2dBzdx Ey=VuBusinθc=const,2emEz=0 Ex=dϕdx,2emϕ=s()miVu22()bz1R1 G(u)=1+tanh(3u) where D is the shock half width, and the coefficients C By and s reflect our lack of knowledge of the noncoplanar magnetic field and the cross‐shock electric field. Magnetic profiles of real low‐Mach number shocks often have whistler precursors and/or downstream magnetic oscillations which affect the ion motion.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By adjusting the shock parameters, we make the far downstream‐derived field consistent with the initial model profile. The following fields will be used as a model of a low‐Mach number shock [see, e.g., Gedalin et al , ]: bz=sinθ2[](R+1)+(R1)Ψ()XMD by=CBy()cosθM2normaldbznormaldX ex=normaldϕnormaldX,2emϕ=s()bz1R1 where Ψ(u)=1+tanh(3u). The motional electric field ey=sinθ (where θ is the angle between the shock normal and the upstream magnetic field) is constant throughout the shock, while e z =0.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adjusting the shock parameters, we make the far downstream-derived field consistent with the initial model profile. The following fields will be used as a model of a low-Mach number shock [see, e.g., Gedalin et al, 2015b]:…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%