2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-014-2250-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering Resonances of Convex Obstacles for General Boundary Conditions

Abstract: Abstract. We study the distribution of resonances for smooth strictly convex obstacles under general boundary conditions. We show that under a pinched curvature condition for the boundary of the obstacle, the resonances are separated into cubic bands and the distribution in each bands satisfies Weyl's law.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reading the works on the case of one strictly convex obstacle O, one could guess in [47,48,49] (see also references therein and [30]) a program on the study of the structure of Σ(H O ) in regions adjacent to R. One of the instruments in this program is the counting function in various shaped strips N ϕ (R) = #{k ∈ Σ(H) : −ϕ(| Re k|) ≤ Im k, |k| ≤ R}, (7.1) where the function ϕ : [0, +∞) → R describes the shape of the strip {−ϕ(| Re k|) ≤ Im k ≤ 0} (see [48]). In particular, [48,49] where an additional parameter α > 0 takes into account the possible polynomial growth [41,53,47,49], we can infer from the results of [25,48,49] that, in the case of a strictly convex obstacle O ⊂ R m satisfying additional pinching conditions of [49] on curvatures of the boundary of O, the support of the measure dAd cub m−1 (µ) is separated from 0 and there exists a partition 0 = µ 0 < µ 1 < µ 2 < · · · < µ 2n+1 < µ 2n+2 = +∞ such that supp dAd cub m−1 (µ) ∩ [µ 2j−1 , µ 2j ] = ∅ and supp dAd cub m−1 (µ) ∩ [µ 2j , µ 2j+1 ] = ∅ , j = 0, .…”
Section: Discussion On Other Classes Of M-d Hamiltoniansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reading the works on the case of one strictly convex obstacle O, one could guess in [47,48,49] (see also references therein and [30]) a program on the study of the structure of Σ(H O ) in regions adjacent to R. One of the instruments in this program is the counting function in various shaped strips N ϕ (R) = #{k ∈ Σ(H) : −ϕ(| Re k|) ≤ Im k, |k| ≤ R}, (7.1) where the function ϕ : [0, +∞) → R describes the shape of the strip {−ϕ(| Re k|) ≤ Im k ≤ 0} (see [48]). In particular, [48,49] where an additional parameter α > 0 takes into account the possible polynomial growth [41,53,47,49], we can infer from the results of [25,48,49] that, in the case of a strictly convex obstacle O ⊂ R m satisfying additional pinching conditions of [49] on curvatures of the boundary of O, the support of the measure dAd cub m−1 (µ) is separated from 0 and there exists a partition 0 = µ 0 < µ 1 < µ 2 < · · · < µ 2n+1 < µ 2n+2 = +∞ such that supp dAd cub m−1 (µ) ∩ [µ 2j−1 , µ 2j ] = ∅ and supp dAd cub m−1 (µ) ∩ [µ 2j , µ 2j+1 ] = ∅ , j = 0, .…”
Section: Discussion On Other Classes Of M-d Hamiltoniansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, the existence of infinitely many resonances in a certain horizontal strip S and asymptotic sequences in S were studied for the case of two convex obstacles in connection with trapped broken characteristic rays (see [29,18,28] and the reviews in [55,28]). Trapping effects for obstacle scattering have motivated also the investigation of asymptotics of N S H (R) for different types of shaped strips S, including semi-logarithmic strips {−C 1 ln(| Re z| + 1) ≤ Im z ≤ 0} and cubic strips [47,48,49,28,30] and references therein; here C 0 , C 1 , C 2 > 0).…”
Section: Main Goals and Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In either even or odd dimensions, Stefanov [33,Section 4] proved lower bounds on n odd (r) and n −1 (r) proportional to r d under certain trapping assumptions on the geometry of R d \ O. On the other hand, again in either even or odd dimensions, for a class of strictly convex O asymptotics of the number of resonances (of order r d−1 ) in certain regions are known, [18,32]. In odd dimensions asymptotics of the resonance counting function have been proved in the special case of O equal to a ball [34,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%