2014
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.3017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering of near normal incidence SH waves by sinusoidal and rough surfaces in 3-D: Comparison to the scalar wave approximation

Abstract: The challenge of accurately simulating how incident scalar waves interact with rough boundaries has made it an important area of research within many scientific disciplines. Conventional methods, which in the majority of cases focus only on scattering in two dimensions, often suffer from long simulation times or reduced accuracy, neglecting phenomena such as multiple scattering and surface self-shadowing. A simulation based on the scalar wave distributed point source method (DPSM) is presented as an alternativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time domain signals are captured using the sampling time interval ∆t = 0.01 µs. This study is on the rough surface, and a surface with sinusoidal curves is used to model the rough surface [7,28]. Amplitude and wavelength of the curves are used to describe the arithmetic average heights and the horizontal parameter.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Rough Surface Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time domain signals are captured using the sampling time interval ∆t = 0.01 µs. This study is on the rough surface, and a surface with sinusoidal curves is used to model the rough surface [7,28]. Amplitude and wavelength of the curves are used to describe the arithmetic average heights and the horizontal parameter.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Rough Surface Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element model (FEM) was used to accurately solve the problem of elastic wave scattering [24][25][26][27]. This numerical method was used to measure the thickness distribution of corrosion surfaces [28,29] and to analyze rough crack scattering [30,31]. Many factors must be considered when ultrasonic testing for a crack scatterer is discussed, including incident frequency, transducer location, and the noise induced by backscatter of ultrasound from the microstructure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in reality, there is a significant difference between a 1D rough surface and three-dimensional (3D) rough surface. Jarvis and Cegla [ 8 , 9 ] also reconstructed a 1D rough surface with a SCF-based method, but the scattering events were simulated by the distributed point source method (DPSM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually a simple algorithm such as the timing between consecutive peaks (peak to peak-P2P) is used to evaluate the travel time and hence the wall thickness (see figure 2). However, if the inner wall surface of the instrumented pipe changes shape, such as during some corrosion/errosion processes, then the ultrasonic wave packets can become distorted [10,11]. This can lead to substantial changes/errors in the estimated wall thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%