1985
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(85)90561-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering of low-energy antiprotons from nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary and future experimental studies of anti-nucleus production require a knowledge of anti-nucleus interaction cross sections with matter which are needed to estimate various experimental corrections, especially those due to particle losses which reduce the detected rate. Because only a few measurements of these cross sections exist, they were calculated using the Glauber approach [152][153][154] and the Monte Carlo averaging method proposed in [155,156]. Two main considerations are used in the calculations: a parameterization of the amplitude of antinucleon-nucleon elastic scattering in the impact parameter representation and a parameterization of one-particle nuclear densities for various nuclei.…”
Section: For This Reason the Glauber Model Was Used To Describe Hadromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary and future experimental studies of anti-nucleus production require a knowledge of anti-nucleus interaction cross sections with matter which are needed to estimate various experimental corrections, especially those due to particle losses which reduce the detected rate. Because only a few measurements of these cross sections exist, they were calculated using the Glauber approach [152][153][154] and the Monte Carlo averaging method proposed in [155,156]. Two main considerations are used in the calculations: a parameterization of the amplitude of antinucleon-nucleon elastic scattering in the impact parameter representation and a parameterization of one-particle nuclear densities for various nuclei.…”
Section: For This Reason the Glauber Model Was Used To Describe Hadromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalkarov and V.A. Karmanov [11] showed that elastic and inelastic (with excitation of nuclear levels) antiproton scattering on C, Ca, and Pb nuclei are described quite well atp kinetic energies of 46.8 and 179.7 MeV within the approximation. The Glauber approach in the question was also used in many other papers.…”
Section: Cross Sections Ofpa Andāa Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the same nomenclature as in [4,11] is used, in particular γ is the amplitude of an elastic antinucleon-nucleon scattering in the impact parameter representation averaged over the spin and isospin degrees of freedom,…”
Section: Dynamics Of Interactions Of Anti-protons and Anti-nuclei Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary and future experimental studies of anti-nucleus production require a knowledge of anti-nucleus interaction cross sections with matter which are needed to estimate various experimental corrections, especially those due to particle losses which reduce the detected rate. Because only a few measurements of these cross sections exist, they were calculated using the Glauber approach [152][153][154] and the Monte Carlo averaging method proposed in [155,156].…”
Section: For This Reason the Glauber Model Was Used To Describe Hadromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian form from [152,154] was used for the amplitude and for the nuclear density the Woods-Saxon distribution for intermediate and heavy nuclei and the Gaussian form for light nuclei was used, with parameters from the paper [157]. Details of the calculations are presented in [158].…”
Section: For This Reason the Glauber Model Was Used To Describe Hadromentioning
confidence: 99%