2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering of Hydrometeors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past decade, millimeter wavelength (cloud) radars have become essential tools for the observations of clouds and precipitation. Cloud radars provide particular advantages for cloud and precipitation studies due to their narrow beam width, inherent high sensitivity, portability, reduced susceptibility to Bragg scattering, and ground clutter (Kollias et al, 2007). These advantages, however, come with the cost of larger signal attenuation caused by atmospheric gases and hydrometeors, which in general increases with frequency.…”
Section: Hydrometeor Attenuation At Millimeter Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, millimeter wavelength (cloud) radars have become essential tools for the observations of clouds and precipitation. Cloud radars provide particular advantages for cloud and precipitation studies due to their narrow beam width, inherent high sensitivity, portability, reduced susceptibility to Bragg scattering, and ground clutter (Kollias et al, 2007). These advantages, however, come with the cost of larger signal attenuation caused by atmospheric gases and hydrometeors, which in general increases with frequency.…”
Section: Hydrometeor Attenuation At Millimeter Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SI could be affected by the presence of clouds in different ways. Several authors have demonstrated the sensitivity of the 90 GHz channels to the emission by supercooled cloud water (e.g., Kneifel et al 2010;Panegrossi et al 2017), which tends to increase the TBs. This effect compensates the cooling of the TBs due to the scattering by the falling snow.…”
Section: ) Dependence On Cloud Cover and Atmospheric Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extremely variable snow-cover extent and snow radiative properties in the MW are one of the main issues in the detection and quantification of snowfall by passive microwave observations, which remain among the most challenging tasks in global precipitation retrieval (Bennartz and Bauer 2003;Skofronick-Jackson et al 2004Noh et al 2009;Levizzani et al 2011;Kongoli and Helfrich 2015;Chen et al 2016;You et al 2017;Kulie et al 2016; and many others). On one side, relative to rainfall, the snowfall scattering signal is much weaker (Grody 1991;Kim et al 2008;Kulie et al 2010), is highly dependent on the complex microphysical characteristics of snowfall (Bennartz and Petty 2001;Liu 2008;Kulie et al 2010;Petty and Huang 2010;Skofronick-Jackson and Johnson 2011;Kuo et al 2016;Olson et al 2016;Eriksson et al 2018;Kneifel et al 2020), and tends to be masked by the atmospheric and liquid water emissivity (Kneifel et al 2010;Johnson et al 2016;Liu and Seo 2013;Wang et al 2013;Panegrossi et al 2017). On the other side, the snow-covered surface emissivity is extremely variable due to rapid changes of snow-cover extent, snow accumulation on the ground, and snowpack radiative properties, with significant effects on the snowfall microwave signal (e.g., Laviola et al 2015;Prigent et al 2003;Noh et al 2009;Takbiri et al 2019;M20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike comprehensive radar simulators (Kollias et al, 2011;Oue et al, 2020;Mech et al, 2020), the Doppler spectrum simulator does not take into account radar instrument specifications or dynamical effects, such as instrument noise level, broadening of the spectrum due to air turbulence, finite beam width, and wind shear. The five moments (radar reflectivity Z e [dBZ], the mean Doppler velocity [m s −1 ], the spectrum width [m s −1 ], the skewness, and the kurtosis) of the Doppler spectrum are computed directly from the idealized spectrum.…”
Section: Radar Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%